史蒂文·兰兹伯格为芝加哥大学经济学博士,现任罗彻斯特大学经济学教授。兰兹伯格在《Slate》网络杂志撰写的“每日经济学”专栏深受欢迎,他也应邀在《财富》、《福布斯》、《纽约时报》、《华盛顿邮报》、《华尔街日报》等刊物发表文章。著有《一个经济学家给女儿的忠告》、《价格理论与应用》,以及畅销书《生命中的经济游戏》。
Steven Landsburg's writings are living proof that economics need not be "the dismal science." Readers of The Armchair Economist and his columns in Slate magazine know that he can make economics not only fun but fascinating, as he searches for the reasons behind the odd facts we face in our daily lives. In More Sex Is Safer Sex, he brings his witty and razor-sharp analysis to the many ways that our individually rational decisions can combine into some truly weird collective results -- and he proposes hilarious and serious ways to fix just about everything.
When you stand up at the ballpark in order to see better, you make a rational decision. When everyone else does it too, the results, of course, are lousy. But this is just the tip of the iceberg of individual sanity and collective madness. Did you know that some people may actually increase the spread of sexually transmitted diseases when they avoid casual sex? Do you know why tall people earn more money than shorter competitors? (Hint: it isn't just unfair, unconscious prejudice.) Do you know why it makes no sense for you to give charitable donations to more than one organization?
Landsburg's solutions to the many ways that modern life is unfair or inefficient are both jaw-dropping and maddeningly defensible. We should encourage people to cut in line at water fountains on hot days. We should let firefighters keep any property they rescue from burning houses. We should encourage more people to act like Scrooge, because misers are just as generous as philanthropists.
Best of all are Landsburg's commonsense solutions to the political problems that plague our democracy. We should charge penalties to jurors if they convict a felon who is later exonerated. We should let everyone vote in two congressional districts: their own, and any other one of their choice. While we're at it, we should redraw the districts according to the alphabetical lists of all voters, rather than by geography. We should pay FDA commissioners with shares of pharmaceutical company stocks, and pay our president with a diversified portfolio of real estate from across the country.
Why do parents of sons stay married more often than parents who have only daughters? Why does early motherhood not only correlate with lower income, but actually cause it? Why do we execute murderers but not the authors of vicious computer viruses? The lesson of this fascinating, fun, and endlessly provocative book is twofold: many apparently very odd behaviors have logical explanations, and many apparently logical behaviors make no sense whatsoever.
正好在图书馆看到有这书,所以就借了,放那里一直没顾上看,因为手头的书太多,后来发现手里的书不够周转,因为限额是5本,要借其他书先得还掉手里的,如果一眼没看就还,有点亏,所以就抓紧时间看看。 以前曾经看过秋叶写的书评,所以好奇,不明白为什么性越多还有且于防治艾...
评分0 先说点儿题外话,想节约时间的朋友可以跳过本部分,直接读第2和第4部分。 1 书还没有读完,我就迫不及待地给《性越多越安全》一个力荐。这跟我个人对书的偏好有关,我喜欢读书,也总是能从书中得到许多自己需要得到的东西。因此,我对大部分的书及其作者都...
评分 评分正好在图书馆看到有这书,所以就借了,放那里一直没顾上看,因为手头的书太多,后来发现手里的书不够周转,因为限额是5本,要借其他书先得还掉手里的,如果一眼没看就还,有点亏,所以就抓紧时间看看。 以前曾经看过秋叶写的书评,所以好奇,不明白为什么性越多还有且于防治艾...
评分没看完,也不觉得需要看完。光看前三个例子就觉得困惑很多,很难说服人。 第一:性越多越安全。 作者的想法是性疾病之所以传染迅速,是因为一群“淫荡”的,“ 不负责任”的(至少在他看来是这样的,得了艾滋病还去做爱的风流鬼们)人由于在一个小圈子里进行性交,所以在这个圈...
读懂不到百分之五十。
评分感觉一般!讲道理很勉强!
评分感觉一般!讲道理很勉强!
评分持有严格性保守观点的人如果采取稍许更开放一点的态度,便可减少prostitute市场需求,从而延缓艾滋病的传播。坚守某一严格教条的人如果采纳稍微颠覆一点的智慧,也许反回增加效率,增强正效果。然而彻底的颠覆如同彻底的性享乐主义一样,会造成灾难性的后果。
评分read First Chapter
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有