Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024


Law and Disagreement

簡體網頁||繁體網頁
Jeremy Waldron 作者
Oxford University Press, USA
譯者
2001-04-12 出版日期
344 頁數
USD 65.00 價格
Paperback
叢書系列
9780199243037 圖書編碼

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 法理學  美國憲法  法學  law  PoliticalScience  Philosophy   


喜歡 Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 的讀者還喜歡




點擊這裡下載
    


想要找書就要到 圖書目錄大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

發表於2024-12-23

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 epub 下載 mobi 下載 pdf 下載 txt 下載 2024

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 epub 下載 pdf 下載 mobi 下載 txt 下載 2024

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024



Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 用戶評價

評分

評分

評分

評分

評分

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 著者簡介


Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 著者簡介


Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 在線電子書下載

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 圖書描述

When people disagree about justice and about individual rights, how should political decisions be made among them? How should they decide about issues like tax policy, welfare provision, criminal procedure, discrimination law, hate speech, pornography, political dissent and the limits of religious toleration? The most familiar answer is that these decisions should be made democratically, by majority voting among the people or their representatives. Often, however, this answer is qualified by adding ' providing that the majority decision does not violate individual rights.' In this book Jeremy Waldron has revisited and thoroughly revised thirteen of his most recent essays. He argues that the familiar answer is correct, but that the qualification about individual rights is incoherent. If rights are the very things we disagree about, then we are quarrelling precisely about what that qualification should amount to. At best, what it means is that disagreements about rights should be resolved by some other procedure, for example, by majority voting, not among the people or their representatives, but among judges in a court. This proposal - although initially attractive - seems much less agreeable when we consider that the judges too disagree about rights, and they disagree about them along exactly the same lines as the citizens. This book offers a comprehensive critique of the idea of the judicial review of legislation. The author argues that a belief in rights is not the same as a commitment to a Bill of Rights. He shows the flaws and difficulties in many common defences of the 'democratic' character of judicial review. And he argues for an alternative approach to the problem of disagreement: when disagreements about rights arise, the respectful way to resolve them is by decision-making among the right-holders on a basis that reflects an equal respect for them as the holders of views about rights. This respect for ordinary right-holders, he argues, has been sadly lacking in the theories of justice, rights, and constitutionalism put forward in recent years by philosophers such as John Rawls and Donald Dworkin. But the book is not only about judicial review. The first tranche of essays is devoted to a theory of legislation, a theory which highlights the size, the scale and the diversity of modern legislative assemblies. Although legislation is often denigrated as a source of law, Waldron seeks to restore its tattered dignity. He deprecates the tendency to disparage legislatures and argues that such disparagement is often a way of bolstering the legitimacy of the courts, as if we had to transform our parliaments into something like the American Congress to justify importing American-style judicial reviews. Law and Disagreement redresses the balances in modern jurisprudence. It presents legislation by a representative assembly as a form of law making which is especially apt for a society whose members disagree with one another about fundamental issues of principle, for it is a form of law making that does not attempt to conceal the fact that our decisions are made and claim their authority in the midst of, not in spite of, our political and moral disagreements. This timely rights-based defence of majoritarian legislation will be welcomed by scholars of legal and political philosophy throughout the world.

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 下載 mobi epub pdf txt 在線電子書下載


想要找書就要到 圖書目錄大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁
你會得到大驚喜!!

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 讀後感

評分

法律是分歧的产物。如果没有分歧,法律也就失去了存在的必要。 吊诡的是,面对分歧,宏大理论的涌现却依然如唐吉珂德战风车似的不屈不挠。 作为一种解答,宏大理论的最大价值并不在于解决分歧,而是提供一种立场。 在这个意义上,批判诸理论和现代性理论一起,持续分化了不...

評分

法律是分歧的产物。如果没有分歧,法律也就失去了存在的必要。 吊诡的是,面对分歧,宏大理论的涌现却依然如唐吉珂德战风车似的不屈不挠。 作为一种解答,宏大理论的最大价值并不在于解决分歧,而是提供一种立场。 在这个意义上,批判诸理论和现代性理论一起,持续分化了不...

評分

法律是分歧的产物。如果没有分歧,法律也就失去了存在的必要。 吊诡的是,面对分歧,宏大理论的涌现却依然如唐吉珂德战风车似的不屈不挠。 作为一种解答,宏大理论的最大价值并不在于解决分歧,而是提供一种立场。 在这个意义上,批判诸理论和现代性理论一起,持续分化了不...

評分

法律是分歧的产物。如果没有分歧,法律也就失去了存在的必要。 吊诡的是,面对分歧,宏大理论的涌现却依然如唐吉珂德战风车似的不屈不挠。 作为一种解答,宏大理论的最大价值并不在于解决分歧,而是提供一种立场。 在这个意义上,批判诸理论和现代性理论一起,持续分化了不...

評分

法律是分歧的产物。如果没有分歧,法律也就失去了存在的必要。 吊诡的是,面对分歧,宏大理论的涌现却依然如唐吉珂德战风车似的不屈不挠。 作为一种解答,宏大理论的最大价值并不在于解决分歧,而是提供一种立场。 在这个意义上,批判诸理论和现代性理论一起,持续分化了不...

類似圖書 點擊查看全場最低價

Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024


分享鏈接





Law and Disagreement 在線電子書 相關圖書




本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度google,bing,sogou

友情鏈接

© 2024 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 圖書目錄大全 版權所有