Larry A. Hickman presents John Dewey as very much at home in the busy mix of contemporary philosophy-as a thinker whose work now, more than fifty years after his death, still furnishes fresh insights into cutting-edge philosophical debates. Hickman argues that it is precisely the rich, pluralistic mix of contemporary philosophical discourse, with its competing research programs in French-inspired postmodernism, phenomenology, Critical Theory, Heidegger studies, analytic philosophy, and neopragmatism-all busily engaging, challenging, and informing one another-that invites renewed examination of Dewey's central ideas. Hickman offers a Dewey who both anticipated some of the central insights of French-inspired postmodernism and, if he were alive today, would certainly be one of its most committed critics, a Dewey who foresaw some of the most trenchant problems associated with fostering global citizenship, and a Dewey whose core ideas are often at odds with those of some of his most ardent neopragmatist interpreters.In the trio of essays that launch this book, Dewey is an observer and critic of some of the central features of French-inspired postmodernism and its American cousin, neopragmatism. In the next four, Dewey enters into dialogue with contemporary critics of technology, including Jrgen Habermas, Andrew Feenberg, and Albert Borgmann. The next two essays establish Dewey as an environmental philosopher of the first rank-a worthy conversation partner for Holmes Ralston, III, Baird Callicott, Bryan G. Norton, and Aldo Leopold. The concluding essays provide novel interpretations of Dewey's views of religious belief, the psychology of habit, philosophical anthropology, and what he termed the epistemology industry.
评分
评分
评分
评分
本来对"后-后现代"、"新-新实用主义"这种提法没啥好感的,但这只是第一章的论点。全书后三章把杜威和法兰克福学派里技术工具论、自然主义和经典实用主义里其他哲学家对比/梳理思想脉路写得清楚,可以参考。
评分本来对"后-后现代"、"新-新实用主义"这种提法没啥好感的,但这只是第一章的论点。全书后三章把杜威和法兰克福学派里技术工具论、自然主义和经典实用主义里其他哲学家对比/梳理思想脉路写得清楚,可以参考。
评分本来对"后-后现代"、"新-新实用主义"这种提法没啥好感的,但这只是第一章的论点。全书后三章把杜威和法兰克福学派里技术工具论、自然主义和经典实用主义里其他哲学家对比/梳理思想脉路写得清楚,可以参考。
评分本来对"后-后现代"、"新-新实用主义"这种提法没啥好感的,但这只是第一章的论点。全书后三章把杜威和法兰克福学派里技术工具论、自然主义和经典实用主义里其他哲学家对比/梳理思想脉路写得清楚,可以参考。
评分本来对"后-后现代"、"新-新实用主义"这种提法没啥好感的,但这只是第一章的论点。全书后三章把杜威和法兰克福学派里技术工具论、自然主义和经典实用主义里其他哲学家对比/梳理思想脉路写得清楚,可以参考。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有