Neither Donkey nor Horse 在线电子书 图书标签: 医疗史 海外中国研究 雷祥麟 历史 醫療史 医学 中国历史 近代史
发表于2025-02-23
Neither Donkey nor Horse 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2025
初步感觉本书是雷教授对其博士论文“When Chinese Medicine Encountered the State: 1910-1949”的扩展,其中有一些章节与原文还是比较类似的,比如第5章“医学革命与国医运动”、第9章“常山”等,在此基础上增加了许多新内容,比如20世纪早期的满洲鼠疫、30-40年代的乡村医疗等。阅读本书也许同时参阅他的几篇文章可能更容易理解,比如“常山—一种新抗疟药物的诞生”、“负责任的医生与有信仰的病人”、“卫生为何不是保卫生命”、“杜聪明的汉医药研究”等。另外,“非驴非马”的说法是来自毛泽东1956年“同音乐工作者的谈话”,而这时中医的地位与1949年以前相比,即将发生翻天覆地的变化。因此“非驴非马”似乎用来形容中医在进入体制之后的尴尬地位更合适。
评分好长,读的累死了。
评分好长,读的累死了。
评分很不错。Lei关于中医现代史的基本论点是:因为中医无法如现代的生物医学/西医那样预防疾病、保障公共健康和进入教育系统,所以为了成为进行现代国家建设的“中国”的国医,必须科学化中医,继而创造出一种“非驴非马”的杂医。但这并不意味着他们是反现代的,这群中医从业者恰恰是探索中医现代性和作为整体的中国现代性的积极行动主体。在共和、国民和共产主义时期,他们在“国家场域”之下代表中医与国家互动,不断使中医进化。自然-文化这一内在分界带来西方-非西方的外在分界,在现代化过程中,我们应该采取Latour的观点,关注两极中的杂合体。在本书中,则是“杂中医”,它不是传统的余孽,也非单纯的试验失败品,它能向我们证明现代科学和非西方文化间可能的关系。我们从未现代过,或者说,他者们也为现代性做出许多贡献。
评分以静态的甚至本质化的“科学”观念来判断历史行动者是否符合“科学”,恰恰错过了他们想突破这些概念范畴所做的努力,对于Modernist Great Divide的反思也在此间了
Sean Hsiang-lin Lei is associate research fellow at the Institute of Modern History, Academia Sinica, Taiwan; associate professor at the Institute of Science, Technology, and Society at National Yang-Ming University; and a member of the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton. He lives in Taipei, Taiwan.
Neither Donkey nor Horse tells the story of how Chinese medicine was transformed from the antithesis of modernity in the early twentieth century into a potent symbol of and vehicle for China’s exploration of its own modernity half a century later. Instead of viewing this transition as derivative of the political history of modern China, Sean Hsiang-lin Lei argues that China’s medical history had a life of its own, one that at times directly influenced the ideological struggle over the meaning of China’s modernity and the Chinese state.
Far from being a remnant of China’s premodern past, Chinese medicine in the twentieth century coevolved with Western medicine and the Nationalist state, undergoing a profound transformation—institutionally, epistemologically, and materially—that resulted in the creation of a modern Chinese medicine. This new medicine was derided as “neither donkey nor horse” because it necessarily betrayed both of the parental traditions and therefore was doomed to fail. Yet this hybrid medicine survived, through self-innovation and negotiation, thus challenging the conception of modernity that rejected the possibility of productive crossbreeding between the modern and the traditional.
By exploring the production of modern Chinese medicine and China’s modernity in tandem, Lei offers both a political history of medicine and a medical history of the Chinese state.
Review
“In this insightful and provocative book, Lei shows us what it meant to practice ‘modern’ medicine in Mao Zedong’s semicolonial and semifeudal society. Drawing on rich historical sources, Neither Donkey nor Horse reveals that modern medicine will always be mongrel medicine. Importantly, Lei gives us the critical postcolonial genealogy for ‘Traditional Chinese Medicine,’ the epitome of Chinese modernity, now a global phenomenon.”
(Warwick Anderson, University of Sydney)
“Reaching far beyond the history of modern China, Neither Donkey nor Horse challenges conventional understanding of modernity, science, and state power through an intellectual and social history of medical debate and development in East Asia from the late nineteenth century forward. This is a thoughtful and meticulously researched investigation of transnational modernizing processes in the twentieth century as they touched down and transformed worlds in China. The book demonstrates that medical knowledge and practice, whether ‘modern’ or ‘traditional,’ historicized or fixed as policy, are nowhere innocent of politics, culture, and social hierarchy. It offers surprising historical lessons for everyone interested in science and local knowledge, socialism and capitalism, institutions and ideas about nature as they weave together in modern regimes of health and population governance.”
(Judith Farquhar, University of Chicago)
“Neither Donkey nor Horse is a tour de force of how both Western and Chinese medicine played central roles not only in Chinese modernity but also the formation of the state in Republican China. Lei thus adroitly relates the politics of medicine and debates over making Chinese medicine more scientific to the big themes of nationalism, the state, and modernity that dominated the political struggles of early twentieth-century China.”
(Marta Hanson, Johns Hopkins University)
“Neither Donkey nor Horse is a major work by the leading scholar in the field of modern Chinese medical history. Lei argues that what we now know as traditional Chinese medicine as it emerged as a discourse in the early twentieth century was fundamentally shaped by the encounter with Western medicine and the relationship with the state that this dictated. Chinese medicine was something new that was created during this period in response to themes with Western biomedicine as traditional practitioners sought social mobility through participation in the state. Lei’s argument is backed up by research of the highest standard: his knowledge of the historical sources is outstanding, and he is impressively familiar with the secondary and theoretical literature in both English and Chinese. His book will be of interest not only to historians of Republican China but also to those interested in the history of science more widely.”
(Henrietta Harrison, University of Oxford)
“If you are going to read just one book on the modern history of Chinese medicine, this is the work to read. Lei’s analysis of the entwinement of medicine, science, modernity, and the state is brilliantly original and persuasive, and argued with admirable clarity. Neither Donkey nor Horse is a major contribution to science studies and the history of global health, as well as to the study of twentieth-century China.”
(Shigehisa Kuriyama, Harvard University)
As Lei is writing this book, he is conscious of Chakrabarty’s criticism of the repeated “temporal structure of the statement, ‘first in the West, and then elsewhere,’” which leads to a certain type of “academic discourse” that “all these other histo...
评分As Lei is writing this book, he is conscious of Chakrabarty’s criticism of the repeated “temporal structure of the statement, ‘first in the West, and then elsewhere,’” which leads to a certain type of “academic discourse” that “all these other histo...
评分As Lei is writing this book, he is conscious of Chakrabarty’s criticism of the repeated “temporal structure of the statement, ‘first in the West, and then elsewhere,’” which leads to a certain type of “academic discourse” that “all these other histo...
评分As Lei is writing this book, he is conscious of Chakrabarty’s criticism of the repeated “temporal structure of the statement, ‘first in the West, and then elsewhere,’” which leads to a certain type of “academic discourse” that “all these other histo...
评分As Lei is writing this book, he is conscious of Chakrabarty’s criticism of the repeated “temporal structure of the statement, ‘first in the West, and then elsewhere,’” which leads to a certain type of “academic discourse” that “all these other histo...
Neither Donkey nor Horse 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2025