Political scientists have long classified systems of government as parliamentary or presidential, two-party or multi party, and so on. But such distinctions often fail to provide useful insights. For example, how are we to compare the United States, a presidential bicameral regime with two weak parties, to Denmark, a parliamentary unicameral regime with many strong parties? "Veto Players" advances an important, new understanding of how governments are structured. The real distinctions between political systems, contends George Tsebelis, are to be found in the extent to which they afford political actors veto power over policy choices. Drawing richly on game theory, he develops a scheme by which governments can thus be classified. He shows why an increase in the number of 'veto players', or an increase in their ideological distance from each other, increases policy stability, impeding significant departures from the status quo. Policy stability affects a series of other key characteristics of polities, argues the author. For example, it leads to high judicial and bureaucratic independence, as well as high government instability (in parliamentary systems). The propositions derived from the theoretical framework Tsebelis develops in the first part of the book are tested in the second part with various data sets from advanced industrialized countries, as well as analysis of legislation in the European Union. Representing the first consistent and consequential theory of comparative politics, "Veto Players" will be welcomed by students and scholars as a defining text of the discipline. From the preface to the Italian edition: 'Tsebelis has produced what is today the most original theory for the understanding of the dynamics of contemporary regimes...This book promises to remain a lasting contribution to political analysis' - Gianfranco Pasquino, Professor of Political Science, University of Bologna.
评分
评分
评分
评分
感觉空间模型比博弈论有意思一些。空间模型多少算个结构理论,博弈论就一群人,你骗我我骗你,还乐此不疲。
评分感觉空间模型比博弈论有意思一些。空间模型多少算个结构理论,博弈论就一群人,你骗我我骗你,还乐此不疲。
评分感觉空间模型比博弈论有意思一些。空间模型多少算个结构理论,博弈论就一群人,你骗我我骗你,还乐此不疲。
评分感觉空间模型比博弈论有意思一些。空间模型多少算个结构理论,博弈论就一群人,你骗我我骗你,还乐此不疲。
评分4.5星。理论简单但应用广泛且论证详实,对总统制vs议会制,公投,公务员,法庭和欧盟的运作论述得很深刻(用央行的自由度来论述公务员与legislature之间的互动那章感觉可以发一篇很好的期刊了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有