This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
评分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
评分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
评分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
评分This monograph was published almost 30 years ago, but some points in them still seemed vibrant in current academic circle on traditional Chinese poetics. After a little tediously long definition of the terminology to distinguish the difference of terms su...
#很有雄心的著作,但最后感觉像“资料汇编”的摘抄,幸好还可以隐约看出逻辑线。比一比同时候出版的Owen的《Traditional Chinese Poetry and Poetics: Omen of the World》就可以看到两人的差距。
评分艱難啃完。余寶琳30年前的專著始終置於西方文學metaphor和allegory的差異視野下來對中世紀中國經典文學的imagery的轉變進行梳理和對比,太過強調「賦比興」的邏輯線索而對其他問題有所忽略。#壹陸讀#095 #SOAS
评分#很有雄心的著作,但最后感觉像“资料汇编”的摘抄,幸好还可以隐约看出逻辑线。比一比同时候出版的Owen的《Traditional Chinese Poetry and Poetics: Omen of the World》就可以看到两人的差距。
评分虽然那么重要然而读起来好无趣……
评分#很有雄心的著作,但最后感觉像“资料汇编”的摘抄,幸好还可以隐约看出逻辑线。比一比同时候出版的Owen的《Traditional Chinese Poetry and Poetics: Omen of the World》就可以看到两人的差距。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有