Dr. Stanley Milgram (August 15, 1933 – December 20, 1984) was a social psychologist at Yale University, Harvard University and the City University of New York. While at Harvard, he conducted the small-world experiment (the source of the six degrees of separation concept), and while at Yale, he conducted the Milgram experiment on obedience to authority. He also introduced the concept of familiar strangers.
The Milgram experiment was a series of seminal social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,and later discussed his findings in greater depth in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.
The experiments began in July 1961, three months after the start of the trial of Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann in Jerusalem. Milgram devised the experiments to answer this question: "Could it be that Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?"
1.纳粹刽子手在公审时为自己大屠杀犹太人辩护:执行上级命令无罪。 2.这引发了作者思考:上级下达的命令是伤天害理的反人道的,应该服从吗?正常人在权威指示下,会做出什么程度的恶行?道德和良知能否抵抗权威的指令? 3.作者设计了这样的实验:对外宣称,研究体罚是否可以提...
評分读完了,发现在人性中有许多我们未曾注意却深深影响我们一生的东西,比如,顺从,追求自由等,米尔格拉姆的实验让普通人站在了天平的中间,一边是顺从权威,遵守纪律,一边是保护别人,自我牺牲。本来两方面都是互不冲突的美好品性,但是通过实验的设置,使得矛盾出现,天平不...
評分1.纳粹刽子手在公审时为自己大屠杀犹太人辩护:执行上级命令无罪。 2.这引发了作者思考:上级下达的命令是伤天害理的反人道的,应该服从吗?正常人在权威指示下,会做出什么程度的恶行?道德和良知能否抵抗权威的指令? 3.作者设计了这样的实验:对外宣称,研究体罚是否可以提...
評分在了解自己之后,我对人”性本善“是持怀疑态度的,因为很多时候自己的想法和行为都在暴露出你不是一个好人,虽然没有做出什么伤天害理的行为,但以小窥大,从0到1的跨越其实并不是特别困难,在没有知道“艾希曼”这个名字和”米尔格拉姆实验“,”斯坦福监狱实验“之前,我也...
評分作者设计了一系列逻辑严谨的心理学实验来探究人们在权威之下执行伤害他人的实验,最后得出的结论是绝大多数人尽管知道自己的行为是在伤害他人、是不符合道德,也不符合善良正义,但是最终仍然会服从权威犯下恶行。 作者通过多种条件的实验来证明该实验的普遍性和说服力,也从多...
執手相看淚眼。
评分第一次一天讀完一本英文書,也是讀過最負能量的一本書。我個人更傾嚮於服從是個人道德感中的個體層麵讓步於集體層麵的一個例子。從進化的觀念講,這種群體道德感也是有利於群體延續的。下一步應該思考的是權威的服從者應該承擔多少責任?另外,我不太認同作者的實驗倫理。他認為這種情感壓力是被者的個人選擇的結果,而我認為這種壓力恰恰在於被試者需要做齣選擇本身。真是既無beneficiary也無consentment。
评分Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one?
评分Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one?
评分Can human nature be changed in such a way that man will forget his longing for freedom, for dignity, for integrity, for love—that is to say, can man forget he is human? Or does human nature have a dynamism which will react to the violation of these basic human needs by attempting to change an inhuman society into a human one?
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有