米歇爾・福柯,20世紀極富挑戰性和反叛性的法國思想傢。青年時期就學於巴黎高等師範學校,以後曾擔任多所大學的教職。1970年起任法蘭西學院思想係統史教授,直至逝世。 福柯振奮多多數研究緻力於考察具體的曆史,由此開掘齣眾多富有衝擊力的思想主題,從而激烈地批判現代理性話語;同時,福柯的行文風格具有鮮明的文學色彩,講究修辭,飽含激情,這也是他在歐美世界産生巨大影響的一個重要原因。
This was Michel Foucault's first major book, written while he was the Director of the Maison de France in Sweden. It examines ideas, practices, institutions, art and literature relating to madness in Western history.
Foucault begins his history in the Middle Ages, noting the social and physical exclusion of lepers. He argues that with the gradual disappearance of leprosy, madness came to occupy this excluded position. The ship of fools in the 15th century is a literary version of one such exclusionary practice, the practice of sending mad people away in ships. However, during the Renaissance, madness was regarded as an all-abundant phenomena because humans could not come close to the Reason of God. As Cervantes' Don Quixote, all humans are ridiculous weak to desires and dissimulation. Therefore, the insane, understood as one who has come too close to God's Reason, was accepted in the middle of society. It is not before the 17th century, in a movement which Foucault famously describes as the Great Confinement, that "unreasonable" members of the population systematically were locked away and institutionalised. In the 18th century, madness came to be seen as the obverse of Reason, that is, as having lost what made them human and become animal-like and therefore treated as such. It is not before 19th century that madness became mental illness that should be cured, e.g. Freud. Later it was demonstrated that the large increase in confinement did not happen in 17th but in the 19th century, somewhat undermining his argument.
Foucault also argues that madness during Renaissance had the power to signify the limits of social order and to point to a deeper truth. This was silenced by the Reason of Enlightenment. He also examines the rise of modern scientific and "humanitarian" treatments of the insane, notably at the hands of Philippe Pinel and Samuel Tuke. He claims that these modern treatments were in fact no less controlling than previous methods. Tuke's country retreat for the mad consisted of punishing the madmen until they gave up their commitment to madness. Similarly, Pinel's treatment of the mad amounted to an extended aversion therapy, including such treatments as freezing showers and use of a straitjacket. In Foucault's view, this treatment amounted to repeated brutality until the pattern of judgment and punishment was internalized by the patient.
《疯癫与文明》是福柯在巴黎高师的第一篇博士论文。作为一个常年来又搞基又SM又喜欢尝试濒死体验的人,他对“疯癫”二字似乎非常有发言权。——据说在他生前的很多时候,都是在夜晚里磕了药,看着夜空中的漫天星斗如流星般乱舞坠落,然后提笔写下了他很多著名的哲学。 这是一...
評分 評分扉页上,福柯创作这篇作品也就是他的博士论文是在一九六四年左右,在当时几经修改出现了缩写本,也就是我们现在看到的《疯癫与文明---理性时代的疯癫史》并且广受好评。要了解福柯的思想或者做一个全面的概括的提升是不可能的,这本书我看过两遍,看完仍旧在很多地方都认识的模...
評分福柯的钥匙 一次要感谢无规可循的阅读,在各种后现代理论著作被大量翻译引进之际,在福柯被如日中天地炒作,“人之死”,“解构”,“身体—权力”等字眼以疯癫的频率出现于各种大报小刊之时,我幸运的读到了这本《疯癫与文明》。据说,在福柯这颗20世纪最伟大的头脑中产生了...
評分《疯癫与文明》是福柯在巴黎高师的第一篇博士论文。作为一个常年来又搞基又SM又喜欢尝试濒死体验的人,他对“疯癫”二字似乎非常有发言权。——据说在他生前的很多时候,都是在夜晚里磕了药,看着夜空中的漫天星斗如流星般乱舞坠落,然后提笔写下了他很多著名的哲学。 这是一...
忘記標記瞭 讀的第一本福柯但也是目前最喜歡的❤️
评分忘記標記瞭 讀的第一本福柯但也是目前最喜歡的❤️
评分knowledge creates a milieu of abstract relationships: "the infirmities of wisdom". 如此可見福柯是靠材料說話的。他思想有極其強大的中氣和滲透力,我以為是因為早期材料對他的訓練有極強的grounding (vs. Derrida hardens
评分看完整個人都中二瞭。
评分knowledge creates a milieu of abstract relationships: "the infirmities of wisdom". 如此可見福柯是靠材料說話的。他思想有極其強大的中氣和滲透力,我以為是因為早期材料對他的訓練有極強的grounding (vs. Derrida hardens
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有