安东尼·吉登斯(Anthony Giddens),英国著名社会理论家和社会学家,剑桥皇家学院院士、伦敦经济政治学院院长、前剑桥大学社会学教授和研究员。
The sexual revolution: an evocative term, but what meaning can be given to it today? How does "sexuality" come into being, and what connections does it have with the changes that have affected personal life more generally? In answering these questions, the author disputes many of the dominant interpretations of the role of sexuality in modern culture. The author suggests that the revolutionary changes in which sexuality has become cauth up are more long-term than generally conceded. He sees them as intrinsic to the development of modern societies as a whole and to the broad characteristics of that development. Sexuality as we know it today is a creation of modernity, a terrain upon which the contradictory tendencies of modern social life play themselves out in full. Emancipation and oppression, opportunity and risk--these have become a part of a heady mix that irresistably ties our individual lives to global outcomes and the transformation of intimacy. We live today in a social order in which, for the first time in histroy, women are becoming equal to men--or at least have lodged a claim to such equality as their right. The author does not attempt to analyze the gender inequalities that persist in the economic or political domains, but instead concentrates on a more hisdden personal area in which women--ordinary women, in the course of their day-to-day lives, quite apart from any political agenda--have pioneered changes of greate, and generalizable, importance. These changes essentially concern an exploration of the potentialities of the "pure relationship," a relaitonship that presumes sexual and emotional equality, and is explosive in its connotations for pre-existing relations of power. The author analyzes the emergence of what he calls plastic sexuality--sexuality freed from its intrinsic relation to reproduction--in terms of the emotional emancipation implicit in the pure relationship, as well as women's claim to sexual pleasure. Plastic sexuality is decentered sexuality, freed from both reproduction and subservience to a fixed object. It can be molded as a trait of personality, and thus become bound up with the reflexivity of the self. Premised on plastic sexuality, the pure relationship is not exclusively heterosexual; it is neutral in terms of sexual orientation. The author speculates that the transformaion of intimacy might be a subversive influence on modern institutions as a whole, for a social world in which the dominant ideal was to achieve intinsic rewards from the company of others might be vastly different from that which we know at the present.
有相同的经历,不必说明,对方就会知道。灵魂里有一道裂痕的感觉,即使人还是一个完整的人,即使看起来了无痕迹,在灵魂深处,有着蝉翼一样薄薄的残残的裂痕,看不出来,但那个地方比别的地方脆弱,不能触碰,即使什么事也没有,即使不同,即使你已流不出泪也不会再哭喊,你也...
评分1、翻译者在前言里面已经对吉登斯的观点进行了反思,说他“在不露声色的中性描述、叙事和分析中”,“偷偷洋溢着乐观的调子”。 他所说的性关系的平等化带来私人领域的民主化,我觉得类似于“社会性别”那一派的观点。男、女两种性别只是社会人为建构的,每个性别类别都对应着...
评分 评分有意思滴视角
评分sociologist sitting in a chair
评分原版逻辑完整。
评分成名之後就連引述的論著都不認真讀。
评分1.感觉自己中二时期弄混了relationship和intimate relationship,平添不少烦恼。 2.吉登斯还是乐观了一些,这么多年,虽然整体来看民主化是在推进,但是私人领域的男女平等以及亲密关系的发展某些方面来说还是一塌糊涂。 3.学术书读着还是很费劲的。人笨还得多看书。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有