Published posthumously, the second edition of The Concept of Law contains one important addition to the first edition, a substantial Postscript, in which Hart reflects upon some of the central concerns that have been expressed about the book since its publication in 1961. The Postscript is especially noteworthy because it contains Hart's only sustained response to the objections pressed by his foremost critic, Ronald Dworkin, who succeeded him to the Chair of Jurisprudence at Oxford. The Postscript focuses on a range of issues covering both Hart's substantive view and his methodological commitments. In particular, Hart endorses Inclusive Legal Positivism, asserts that his is a methodology of descriptive jurisprudence which he contrasts with Dworkin's normative jurisprudence or interpretivism, while denying that his theory of law has a semantic underpinning. The essays in this collection address each of these issues in a sustained way. The book contains discussions of Hart's semantic commitments, his rejection of a normative jurisprudence as well as the extent to which he can embrace Inclusive Legal Positivism in a way that is consistent with his other stated positions. The book's contributors include the leading advocates of alternative schools of Positivist jurisprudence, important contributors to the methodogical disputes in jurisprudence and noted experts on the relationship of philosophy of language to jurisprudence. Among the contributors of note are: Joseph Raz, Jules L. Coleman, Stephen Perry, Brian Leiter, Scott Shapiro and Andrei Marmor.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
看瞭兩篇，還有五篇在其他文集/專著中看過
评分當今法理學大咖們對哈德論戰的解讀，相當精彩！先是哈特實證主義理論的語義學（semantic）概念分析（1，2，3篇），然後進入為吸收德翁批評而演化的包容性及排他性（inclusive vs. exclusive）實證主義的論題兼容性討論（4，5篇），哈特倡導的描述性法理學（descriptive jurisprudence）的方法論是否可能及其背後（能否）省略的規範性問題（6，7，9篇）。對梳理問題-流派的當代學術發展脈絡甚有裨益，也順便見識法理前沿學者的文筆/風格/（部分）視野格局。覺得Endicott，科爾曼，夏皮羅，Perry的文筆最簡潔流暢；第11篇討論哈德二人各自理論的背後的政治關切，覺得有點moot，第8篇挑戰拉茲的“閤法權威”truism討論有點隻見樹木不見森林，第12篇好隨便
评分當今法理學大咖們對哈德論戰的解讀，相當精彩！先是哈特實證主義理論的語義學（semantic）概念分析（1，2，3篇），然後進入為吸收德翁批評而演化的包容性及排他性（inclusive vs. exclusive）實證主義的論題兼容性討論（4，5篇），哈特倡導的描述性法理學（descriptive jurisprudence）的方法論是否可能及其背後（能否）省略的規範性問題（6，7，9篇）。對梳理問題-流派的當代學術發展脈絡甚有裨益，也順便見識法理前沿學者的文筆/風格/（部分）視野格局。覺得Endicott，科爾曼，夏皮羅，Perry的文筆最簡潔流暢；第11篇討論哈德二人各自理論的背後的政治關切，覺得有點moot，第8篇挑戰拉茲的“閤法權威”truism討論有點隻見樹木不見森林，第12篇好隨便
评分看瞭兩篇，還有五篇在其他文集/專著中看過
评分當今法理學大咖們對哈德論戰的解讀，相當精彩！先是哈特實證主義理論的語義學（semantic）概念分析（1，2，3篇），然後進入為吸收德翁批評而演化的包容性及排他性（inclusive vs. exclusive）實證主義的論題兼容性討論（4，5篇），哈特倡導的描述性法理學（descriptive jurisprudence）的方法論是否可能及其背後（能否）省略的規範性問題（6，7，9篇）。對梳理問題-流派的當代學術發展脈絡甚有裨益，也順便見識法理前沿學者的文筆/風格/（部分）視野格局。覺得Endicott，科爾曼，夏皮羅，Perry的文筆最簡潔流暢；第11篇討論哈德二人各自理論的背後的政治關切，覺得有點moot，第8篇挑戰拉茲的“閤法權威”truism討論有點隻見樹木不見森林，第12篇好隨便
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有