Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
- 政治学
- 历史社会学
- 社会学
- 查尔斯·蒂利
- 历史
- 欧洲
- Politics
- 英文原版
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
具体描述
读后感
带着对刘仲敬“封建制度积累创造组织资源，大一统消耗组织资源”这一论断的怀疑，来看tilly对欧洲国家建设的解释。Tilly认为国家能力建设的过程，就是coercion与capital的集中化，通过没收公民的武器，解散封建制度中各分封领主的武装，来垄断暴力，来达到前者，而税收制度的建...
评分 评分 评分[美]查尔斯·蒂利.强制、资本和欧洲国家[M].2007 第一章 世界历史中的城市和国家 ·把国家定义成不同于家庭和亲属团体运用强制的组织。2 ·问题：如何解释990年以来欧洲盛行国家类型在时空上的巨大差异，而后来都成了民族国家的不同变体？为什么如此相似的方向道路如此不同？ ...
评分迄今已浅浅阅读了Tilly的两类著作：社会运动、国家建构。 如果有“历史政治学”这个学科，Tilly应该是当之无愧的大佬，以及如果有“画图强迫症”，或者“分析框架星人”等学者类型，或许他也会榜上有名。 僭越了。。。 但事实确实是：尽管Tilly在开篇试图避免“单因素解释”...
用户评价
Good, but not awesome, model
评分Tilly的研究堪称该领域的典范，但相比韦伯和福柯的研究，还是显得单薄。现代国家要比这个金铁主义的图景丰富得多。
评分coercion-intensive, capital-intensive, capitalized coercion, bargaining and struggling, organization, state structures appeared chiefly as a by-product of rulers' efforts to acquire the means of war.
评分梯利观点极易被简化，遗憾。欧洲战争和军事演变触发权力向国家的集中。强制和资本在辩证关系中相互促进，使得民间武装逐渐成为国家暴力，租-贡关系逐渐变成财政系统。意外后果是国家将国民同质化，国家-社会关系变得更为直接，社会运动和公民权利兴起。强制-资本的组合与逻辑解释欧洲国家殊途同归
评分it's brilliant. parsimonious but convincing model of coercion and capital to explain state formation even though it neglects the role of ideas and culture and seems a bit too functionalist/structuralist and limited in terms of space and time
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有