Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
[美]查尔斯·蒂利.强制、资本和欧洲国家[M].2007 第一章 世界历史中的城市和国家 ·把国家定义成不同于家庭和亲属团体运用强制的组织。2 ·问题:如何解释990年以来欧洲盛行国家类型在时空上的巨大差异,而后来都成了民族国家的不同变体?为什么如此相似的方向道路如此不同? ...
评分在当今的世界,每个国家都在通过自己所控制的资源(如课堂教育和宣传),在本地区传统的宗教、语言和部族等基础上,来打造诸如“法兰西民族”、“大和民族”、“美利坚民族”或“德意志民族”等等观念。用社会学术语来说,我们可以把这些观念称为“想象的共同体”。这一“想象...
评分在当今的世界,每个国家都在通过自己所控制的资源(如课堂教育和宣传),在本地区传统的宗教、语言和部族等基础上,来打造诸如“法兰西民族”、“大和民族”、“美利坚民族”或“德意志民族”等等观念。用社会学术语来说,我们可以把这些观念称为“想象的共同体”。这一“想象...
评分[美]查尔斯·蒂利.强制、资本和欧洲国家[M].2007 第一章 世界历史中的城市和国家 ·把国家定义成不同于家庭和亲属团体运用强制的组织。2 ·问题:如何解释990年以来欧洲盛行国家类型在时空上的巨大差异,而后来都成了民族国家的不同变体?为什么如此相似的方向道路如此不同? ...
评分中世纪的各种封建政权,其统治的流动性是很高的,所谓的“本土”概念尚不成熟。今日形成的边界明确的国家本土政治秩序在中世纪难以成立,事实上今日欧洲国家边界内的各个地区,在彼时的利益分歧比今日边界之外的地区还要更大,这些合纵连横是很复杂的。故而不了解中世纪,不可...
On this level of weaving politics and economy together, how can you say he could possibly be wrong?讨论现代社会的秩序和共同性,强制、资本和国家应该是最大的三个关键词,对应的反题就是政治发展的新要素:民主、平等与公民社会。用一本书把自己最关心的问题全部总结出来,格局宏阔让人羡慕。
评分Tilly的研究堪称该领域的典范,但相比韦伯和福柯的研究,还是显得单薄。现代国家要比这个金铁主义的图景丰富得多。
评分it's brilliant. parsimonious but convincing model of coercion and capital to explain state formation even though it neglects the role of ideas and culture and seems a bit too functionalist/structuralist and limited in terms of space and time
评分not so coherent as works of Anderson, Mann, and Moore.
评分Good, but not awesome, model
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有