Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
可能翻译有一些问题,使得我对这本书的理解有些问题。当然,更重要的还是我对西方历史的欠账:从这个方面来说,这是我的问题,不能太多的寻找客观原因。因为,正如阅读卡尔·波兰尼的《大转型》一样,历史的欠账使得对这一类书籍的阅读变成了走马观花。但是,我还是要强调...
評分好好的一本学术著作就这么给糟蹋了。百度了一下译者的情况,看来外行真是最好不要出位搞翻译,套用译者另一部译作的标题,读他的翻译简直就是“一个政治学学生的梦魇”。 “很差”的评价不是给原著的,而是给翻译的。
評分可能翻译有一些问题,使得我对这本书的理解有些问题。当然,更重要的还是我对西方历史的欠账:从这个方面来说,这是我的问题,不能太多的寻找客观原因。因为,正如阅读卡尔·波兰尼的《大转型》一样,历史的欠账使得对这一类书籍的阅读变成了走马观花。但是,我还是要强调...
評分Most of today’s literatures addressing the issue of elite incentives and state-formation are more or less inspired by Tilly’s brilliant writing. In his widely cited article and the later book, Tilly highlights the crucial role war-making plays in the maki...
評分社会现象不同于自然现象,因为有了人的参与。人可以弄清楚自然界的运行规律,却很难弄清楚由人所组成的社会的运行规律。而这就给各种社会理论提供了无限的发挥空间,于是乎,解释社会发展的理论就多如牛毛,只要言之成理,不同人们的常识和逻辑严重违背,都会有自己的拥护...
On this level of weaving politics and economy together, how can you say he could possibly be wrong?討論現代社會的秩序和共同性,強製、資本和國傢應該是最大的三個關鍵詞,對應的反題就是政治發展的新要素:民主、平等與公民社會。用一本書把自己最關心的問題全部總結齣來,格局宏闊讓人羨慕。
评分it's brilliant. parsimonious but convincing model of coercion and capital to explain state formation even though it neglects the role of ideas and culture and seems a bit too functionalist/structuralist and limited in terms of space and time
评分精神上很馬剋思瞭w
评分上co-evolution的時候Padgett批評這本書read history backward,即用現成的理論去套曆史,而且沒有把國傢/coercion和市場/capital放在一起綜閤分析,而是生硬的二分。讀完後感覺所謂backward的問題沒有Padgett說的那麼嚴重,不過可能因為曆史資料的欠缺和篇幅限製Tilly沒有很完整地考察歐洲各國形成之初的coercion和capital情況。Coercion和Capital的二分確實有些生硬,兩個係統之間的交叉分析不足,比不上Padgett的融閤。但這無礙Tilly成為歐洲史和民族國傢研究的大傢。我覺得自己以前在國內接觸過的很多歐洲史和國傢發展觀點都有Tilly的影子。另外據說Tilly教齣來的許多學生都有嚴重的歐洲中心傾嚮。
评分精神上很馬剋思瞭w
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有