Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
- 政治學
- 曆史社會學
- 社會學
- 查爾斯·蒂利
- 曆史
- 歐洲
- Politics
- 英文原版
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
具體描述
讀後感
可能翻译有一些问题，使得我对这本书的理解有些问题。当然，更重要的还是我对西方历史的欠账：从这个方面来说，这是我的问题，不能太多的寻找客观原因。因为，正如阅读卡尔·波兰尼的《大转型》一样，历史的欠账使得对这一类书籍的阅读变成了走马观花。但是，我还是要强调...
評分好好的一本学术著作就这么给糟蹋了。百度了一下译者的情况，看来外行真是最好不要出位搞翻译，套用译者另一部译作的标题，读他的翻译简直就是“一个政治学学生的梦魇”。 “很差”的评价不是给原著的，而是给翻译的。
評分带着对刘仲敬“封建制度积累创造组织资源，大一统消耗组织资源”这一论断的怀疑，来看tilly对欧洲国家建设的解释。Tilly认为国家能力建设的过程，就是coercion与capital的集中化，通过没收公民的武器，解散封建制度中各分封领主的武装，来垄断暴力，来达到前者，而税收制度的建...
評分社会现象不同于自然现象，因为有了人的参与。人可以弄清楚自然界的运行规律，却很难弄清楚由人所组成的社会的运行规律。而这就给各种社会理论提供了无限的发挥空间，于是乎，解释社会发展的理论就多如牛毛，只要言之成理，不同人们的常识和逻辑严重违背，都会有自己的拥护...
用戶評價
it's brilliant. parsimonious but convincing model of coercion and capital to explain state formation even though it neglects the role of ideas and culture and seems a bit too functionalist/structuralist and limited in terms of space and time
评分Flipping over Marx's historical materialism, but still attached to it
评分Tilly的研究堪稱該領域的典範，但相比韋伯和福柯的研究，還是顯得單薄。現代國傢要比這個金鐵主義的圖景豐富得多。
评分PE Core
评分這個模式被用來解釋戰國到秦漢的政治格局
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有