Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 在線電子書 圖書標籤: 政治學 曆史社會學 社會學 查爾斯·蒂利 曆史 歐洲 Politics 英文原版
發表於2024-11-21
Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024
經典,無需多說,不過蒂利的理論略顯宏大,也許這本書沒有空間寫細節瞭
評分上co-evolution的時候Padgett批評這本書read history backward,即用現成的理論去套曆史,而且沒有把國傢/coercion和市場/capital放在一起綜閤分析,而是生硬的二分。讀完後感覺所謂backward的問題沒有Padgett說的那麼嚴重,不過可能因為曆史資料的欠缺和篇幅限製Tilly沒有很完整地考察歐洲各國形成之初的coercion和capital情況。Coercion和Capital的二分確實有些生硬,兩個係統之間的交叉分析不足,比不上Padgett的融閤。但這無礙Tilly成為歐洲史和民族國傢研究的大傢。我覺得自己以前在國內接觸過的很多歐洲史和國傢發展觀點都有Tilly的影子。另外據說Tilly教齣來的許多學生都有嚴重的歐洲中心傾嚮。
評分精神上很馬剋思瞭w
評分Tilly這本書現在也是研究早期近代歐洲國傢形成的經典之作,尤其是Tilly從資本與強製這兩個維度解釋歐洲國傢的形成是相當具有解釋力的。不過Tilly將曆史發展進行二分,再通過排列組閤解釋歐洲國傢的特殊性,在某種程度上具有簡化曆史的傾嚮,不過理論構建,尤其是1000年的曆史又需要簡化,這個問題終究在社會科學裏不是問題。
評分it's brilliant. parsimonious but convincing model of coercion and capital to explain state formation even though it neglects the role of ideas and culture and seems a bit too functionalist/structuralist and limited in terms of space and time
Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
迄今已浅浅阅读了Tilly的两类著作:社会运动、国家建构。 如果有“历史政治学”这个学科,Tilly应该是当之无愧的大佬,以及如果有“画图强迫症”,或者“分析框架星人”等学者类型,或许他也会榜上有名。 僭越了。。。 但事实确实是:尽管Tilly在开篇试图避免“单因素解释”...
評分张 弛:评《强制、资本和欧洲国家(公元990-1992年)》一书的翻译问题 时间:2009年4月13日 作者:张弛(北京大学历史学系研究生) 来源:中国政法大学学报 关键词: 年近八十的查尔斯•梯利是美国哥伦比亚大学特聘的约瑟夫•L•伯腾威泽(The Joseph. Buttenwieser)...
評分社会现象不同于自然现象,因为有了人的参与。人可以弄清楚自然界的运行规律,却很难弄清楚由人所组成的社会的运行规律。而这就给各种社会理论提供了无限的发挥空间,于是乎,解释社会发展的理论就多如牛毛,只要言之成理,不同人们的常识和逻辑严重违背,都会有自己的拥护...
評分Coercion, Capital and European States, A.D.990-1990 在線電子書 pdf 下載 txt下載 epub 下載 mobi 下載 2024