Mark Leonard is Executive Director of the European Council on Foreign Relations, the first pan-European think tank with offices in Berlin, London, Paris, Rome, Sofia and Warsaw. Previously he worked at the Centre for European Reform and was founding director of the Foreign Policy Centre. He has spent time in Washington as a Transatlantic fellow at the German Marshall Fund of the United States, and in Beijing as a visiting scholar at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. His first book, Why Europe Will run the 21st Century, has been translated into 18 languages. Mark's essays and articles have appeared in publications on both sides of the Atlantic including The Economist, The Guardian, The Financial Times, The Spectator, The Sun, Liberation, Die Welt and the Wall Street Journal.
'Just in case you thought there was no internal debate about China's future, here is evidence to the contrary.' --- Chris Patten
Very few things that happen in our lifetime will be remembered after we are dead. But China's rise is different: like the rise and fall of Rome or the Soviet Empire, its after-effects will echo down the generations to come.
So why is it that we know almost nothing about the thinkers in China who are shaping their country's future? What kind of country are they dreaming of? How do they see their influence in the world? We might know that half of the world's clothes and footwear have a 'Made in China' label and that our economies are inextricably linked with China's --- but what do we know about China's experiments with democracy; about its anti-globalisation movement; about its plans to deal with America as its own influence grows across the globe?
Mark Leonard provides a fascinating and unexpected perspective on the debates raging within Chinese society today and shows us just how radically China's rise will change the nature of our world.
Mark Leonard的这本书,是通过甘阳去年底上凤凰台的世纪大讲堂时提及的。看了节目之后觉得很有意思,就去图书馆借来看了。 出乎意料的是这是一本非常薄的书,花了4个睡前的晚上就很快看完了。他本人在英国的英国Prospect杂志上写过一个简略版,已经通过国内网站翻译成中文了。...
评分因为找不到《新周刊》的第300期,所以我只能寄居它姐姐这里了。 《新周刊》300期,308页,才15块。对一个穷书生来说,这算是又收获一件打折货了。 因为我一直有一个记词条的本子,没写一个词就在底下大侃特侃,知道能把这个词的全部意义榨干,自以为这是从文字学...
评分书不算厚,不到一个星期就可以读完。作者的语言也很浅显易懂。后边还是对于当代中国不同政治经济社会学者的简介,而这本书的很大成书基础就是对这些学者的思想观点的描述。看这本书的时候我一直想起来一句话,那就是温总去年在接受新闻周刊记者事后说的那句话,“民主不应该只...
评分。1980-2000, 最初十年是新右派思想占主导。新右知识分子提倡市场经济,认为中国必须一步步市场化;主张解体国家企业,反对计划经济;提倡“小政府”,认为政府应当缩权。。自2002年以来,中国政府的很多政策都向新左理论靠拢,强调关注老百姓,建设和谐社会等等 。从新右...
评分。1980-2000, 最初十年是新右派思想占主导。新右知识分子提倡市场经济,认为中国必须一步步市场化;主张解体国家企业,反对计划经济;提倡“小政府”,认为政府应当缩权。。自2002年以来,中国政府的很多政策都向新左理论靠拢,强调关注老百姓,建设和谐社会等等 。从新右...
China’s intellectuals are turning away from the West and theorizing an alternative modernity
评分新马基雅维利那一段写得尤其精彩!叙述中国学者思想观点、理论发展和派系争论。其实国内学者原可以写出类似的更好的书。。。。。
评分恕我无知,我现在才真正明白为啥老说THU是新左的老巢了。其实这本书不完全可算作中国知识分子的系谱,但是对于我这等无知的人还是很有用的,它至少让我知道知识分子们在干什么,在怎么影响着这个国家。有人说这本说讲“新左”多了一些,但事实上也正是因为“新左”的力量的壮大。想起一个国关学长说的知识分子的三个轨道制,一二轨的知识分子必然得到政府更多的关注,像秦晖老师这样三轨自由知识分子只能谦虚的自称“只重学理”。其实这本书更多的才是关注的中国的现代性的问题,关于经济改制的,社会民主的主要以中国知识分子聚焦的话题仔细考察的是这个国家。书中多次提到重庆,不知几年前的轻轨票价听证会竟是一场政治试验。我本还以为政治制度的全国大同。还有很多想说,待笔记。
评分经济与政治,知道了挺多八卦的
评分China’s intellectuals are turning away from the West and theorizing an alternative modernity
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有