What is comparative philosophy? This question is ultimately a methodological one according to this much-needed book. The cultivation of area studies in diverse traditions has opened up opportunities for cross-cultural understanding that have rarely existed before, and comparative philosophy is a rapidly emerging area of inquiry. Yet, surprisingly little has been written on comparative methodology in philosophy. Of course, there is much at stake in how we compare things: how comparison is done determines what comparison is. Author Robert W. Smid provides a critical review of four of the most influential comparative methodologies within the American pragmatist and process philosophical traditions, those of William Ernest Hocking, F.S.C. Northrop, Robert Cummings Neville, and David L. Hall in collaboration with Roger T. Ames. Discussing the history of each methodology's development and critically assessing its strengths and weaknesses, Smid demonstrates that it is possible to compare methods as well as traditions and encourages those interested to join the contemporary conversation.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
霍金從比較宗教到比較哲學，寫瞭一篇關於硃熹的文章後在1939年在夏威夷大學東西哲學大會，自譽“實用理念主義者”。難怪隻有夏威夷大學把東方哲學放進哲學係。
评分霍金從比較宗教到比較哲學，寫瞭一篇關於硃熹的文章後在1939年在夏威夷大學東西哲學大會，自譽“實用理念主義者”。難怪隻有夏威夷大學把東方哲學放進哲學係。
评分霍金從比較宗教到比較哲學，寫瞭一篇關於硃熹的文章後在1939年在夏威夷大學東西哲學大會，自譽“實用理念主義者”。難怪隻有夏威夷大學把東方哲學放進哲學係。
评分霍金從比較宗教到比較哲學，寫瞭一篇關於硃熹的文章後在1939年在夏威夷大學東西哲學大會，自譽“實用理念主義者”。難怪隻有夏威夷大學把東方哲學放進哲學係。
评分霍金從比較宗教到比較哲學，寫瞭一篇關於硃熹的文章後在1939年在夏威夷大學東西哲學大會，自譽“實用理念主義者”。難怪隻有夏威夷大學把東方哲學放進哲學係。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有