Why is the Mona Lisa the most famous painting in the world? Why did Facebook succeed when other social networking sites failed? Did the surge in Iraq really lead to less violence? How much can CEO’s impact the performance of their companies? And does higher pay incentivize people to work hard?
If you think the answers to these questions are a matter of common sense, think again. As sociologist and network science pioneer Duncan Watts explains in this provocative book, the explanations that we give for the outcomes that we observe in life—explanation that seem obvious once we know the answer—are less useful than they seem.
Drawing on the latest scientific research, along with a wealth of historical and contemporary examples, Watts shows how common sense reasoning and history conspire to mislead us into believing that we understand more about the world of human behavior than we do; and in turn, why attempts to predict, manage, or manipulate social and economic systems so often go awry.
It seems obvious, for example, that people respond to incentives; yet policy makers and managers alike frequently fail to anticipate how people will respond to the incentives they create. Social trends often seem to have been driven by certain influential people; yet marketers have been unable to identify these “influencers” in advance. And although successful products or companies always seem in retrospect to have succeeded because of their unique qualities, predicting the qualities of the next hit product or hot company is notoriously difficult even for experienced professionals.
Only by understanding how and when common sense fails, Watts argues, can we improve how we plan for the future, as well as understand the present—an argument that has important implications in politics, business, and marketing, as well as in science and everyday life.
Duncan J. Watts (born 1971) is an Australian researcher and a principal research scientist at Yahoo! Research, where he directs the Human Social Dynamics group. He is also a past external faculty member of the Santa Fe Institute and a former professor of sociology at Columbia University, where he headed the Collective Dynamics Group. He is author of the book Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age and Everything is Obvious Once You Know the Answer.
生活中,我们有个词汇,叫“马后炮”,专指一些后见之明的、事后诸葛的家伙。 作为平凡老百姓,我们可以坦然面对这种缺陷,并且一笑了之。但如果说,在严谨的社会学研究界,也大量充斥着很多的马后炮,就不能不让人惊讶了,毕竟,这些家伙可是专业人士啊。 恰恰是专业人士...
评分 评分生活中,我们有个词汇,叫“马后炮”,专指一些后见之明的、事后诸葛的家伙。 作为平凡老百姓,我们可以坦然面对这种缺陷,并且一笑了之。但如果说,在严谨的社会学研究界,也大量充斥着很多的马后炮,就不能不让人惊讶了,毕竟,这些家伙可是专业人士啊。 恰恰是专业人士...
评分反常识社会科学。作者本身是社会网络领域的大牛,因此各种案例用起来也是得心应手。不过我觉得最好看的还是时不时冒出来的,其他学科和社会学家自己对社会学的吐槽,又无奈又好笑。
评分Common Sense篇看完,其中核心点似乎在说明“常识”是人类理解世界的重要框架,但是常识在运用于解释由大量社会成员的活动所造成的现象、事件时,具有很强的误导性,这种误导与人类对于简单因果关系的嗜好,以及对微观与宏观的过渡过程不明有关。
评分看来社会科学仅仅是刚开始啊,混沌学真是让人从科学角度最能体会到命运无常的了,接下来看失控!
评分算是对我自己有启发。作者以个人到群体到社会系统的层次分析了常识的错误,以及社会科学难做研究的原因。最直接的结果就是看过这本书的人对于几乎所有分析“XXX为什么成功”的文章都会持保留意见。
评分这本书的reference和notes部分占了30%,导致我对书的文字量失去了正确判断。读完的感觉不是爽快而是解脱,全书的观点感觉少了一个清晰的抓手,可能只是切断了现象和解释之间的纽带让人更质疑的看待事情。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有