Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
评分Deceptively accessible and seductively titled, this book is highly theoretical. Such book likely to further the monologue tendency among anthropologists, while allure un-theoretical readers with a pompous sense of justice. Is this kind of writing style a so...
语言的部分太弱,可惜
评分用governmentality从上而下分析教育制度,其实说不上哪里不靠谱,很多规则可能因为熟悉而淡化。但用教育/名校学位和成功/happiness联系起来并非东亚独有。再则,这样看下去学生们都是受体,完全受制度控制的(不然从做个人主义的也没法写东西了)。
评分能让一外国人写出这么真实的中国教育也不容易。
评分邹平的中学生对作者说:“学霸好啊,不容易被黑社会霸凌。”作者叹一口气,“哎,怎样才能让你们相信美国高中有nerds和geeks的存在呢。”#又很喜欢,怎么办
评分作者开宗名义,为何在读书并不一定在经济上更有利的时代,中国人的教育意愿仍然如此强烈。作者提出在总体性社会事实中对其进行考察(没错就是莫斯的概念!),通过文化、governing(不只是政府自上而下的管理,参考福柯的权力之网)和emplacement(既扎根邹平,又放眼全国东亚全世界)进行考察。提出中国人的教育意愿是由快速工业化,人口结构转型,文化男子气概,国家建设和典型表彰这几方面互相纠缠互为因果的。个人感觉第四章有身体化部分的描写是亮点。缺憾是感觉desire这个词可以好好做下理论分析的但作者没有,素质教育部分不如某个我忘记名字的人写得好。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有