In this title, two renowned political scientists make the contrarian, research-based case that - regardless of any other factors political scientists or historians may find relevant - the calculations and actions of rulers are the driving force of all politics, and the primary goal of rulers is to maintain power as long as possible. In this clever and accessible book, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith introduce us to their perspective of the political world. They bare the logic of politics, starting from the simple premise that leaders pursue their own ends, and that populations either have, or more often don't have, the power to constrain them to a significant degree. The book is organized by a series interconnected questions, among them: Why do leaders who wreck their countries keep their jobs for so long? Why do autocracies have dismal economic policies? How are there so many suffering people in resource-rich lands? Why do 'natural disasters' disproportionately strike poor nations? Why do 'evil-doers' so often collect loads of foreign aid? Why are democracies so good at war? In answering these questions, the authors look at politics, the choices of public policies, and even decisions about war and peace as lying outside of conventional thinking about culture and history. They set aside ideas of civic virtue and psychopathology. Such notions simply are not central to understanding what leaders do and why they do it. Instead, Bueno de Mesquita and Smith see politicians as self-interested louts, just the sort of people you wouldn't want to have over for dinner, but without whom you might not have dinner at all. And from this perspective, they are able to answer some perplexing mysteries of politics, shed light on what we read in the newspapers every single day, and offer realistic ways of improving human governance.
About the Author
Bruce Bueno de Mesquita is the Julius Silver Professor of Politics and director of the Alexander Hamilton Center for Political Economy at New York University. He is the author of 16 books, including The Predictioneer’s Game.Alastair Smith is professor of politics at New York University. The recipient of three grants from the National Science Foundation and author of three books, he was chosen as the 2005 Karl Deutsch Award winner, given biennially to the best international relations scholar under the age of 40.
本来对某些出版社愿意引进这样的书还是很高兴的,但如果把一本书经过断章取义的处理后再出版,很难讲还算不算做善事,因为有可能给原著抹黑。 翻了没几页,就看到“东北亚某个国家”这样的词了,本能的认为原著不可能这样写,于是找来英文原著做了简单的对照。没想到这一对照,...
评分很有趣的一本书 看完有一段时间了 也没做全书总结但仍印象深刻 据说中文版删改很多 回头看英文版吧 书里阐述了很多关于民主和独裁体制的关键特点等等 码了一大堆字,豆瓣告诉我涉及敏感内容不能发表。。。 总之...
评分 评分很有趣的一本书 看完有一段时间了 也没做全书总结但仍印象深刻 据说中文版删改很多 回头看英文版吧 书里阐述了很多关于民主和独裁体制的关键特点等等 码了一大堆字,豆瓣告诉我涉及敏感内容不能发表。。。 总之...
评分放诸古今皆准的权力规则 http://www.dfdaily.com/html/1170/2013/3/10/958748.shtml 万维钢 发表于2013-03-10 01:21 十九世纪末的比利时国王利奥波德二世完全有理由成为一些人心中的偶像。 不管你是独裁者还是民主国家领导人,或者公司的CEO,只要能不折不扣地执...
I think selectorate theory is an extention of realism school instead of a stand-alone theory. Overall an exciting theory with somewhat funky examples.
评分东方早报推荐的,文笔简洁,观点有趣。可惜我近期心情有限,没有读完就还给图书馆了。
评分:无
评分作者还是想说民主是个好东西. 此外, 对外援助通讯器材比食品药物更有利于推进被援助国的民主
评分选择人理论(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selectorate_theory)有点像用历史结果来决定建模准确性的游戏论的一个特例,优点是这个模型适合解释很多有趣的现象,尤其是近代非洲诸国独立后经历的各种独裁。如果你经常纳闷为何一个独裁者能稳固政权那么久,也许这本书可以提供一些答案,或者至少是思考的源头。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有