約翰·菲尼斯係牛津大學法學教授、大學院(university college)法理學研究員。
First published in 1980, Natural Law and Natural Rights is widely heralded as a seminal contribution to the philosophy of law, and an authoritative restatement of natural law doctrine. It has offered generations of students and other readers a thorough grounding in the central issues of legal, moral, and political philosophy from Finnis's distinctive perspective. This new edition includes a substantial postscript by the author, in which he responds to thirty years of discussion, criticism and further work in the field to develop and refine the original theory. The book closely integrates the philosophy of law with ethics, social theory and political philosophy. The author develops a sustained and substantive argument; it is not a review of other people's arguments but makes frequent illustrative and critical reference to classical, modern, and contemporary writers in ethics, social and political theory, and jurisprudence. The preliminary First Part reviews a century of analytical jurisprudence to illustrate the dependence of every descriptive social science upon evaluations by the theorist. A fully critical basis for such evaluations is a theory of natural law. Standard contemporary objections to natural law theory are reviewed and shown to rest on serious misunderstandings. The Second Part develops in ten carefully structured chapters an account of: basic human goods and basic requirements of practical reasonableness, community and 'the common good'; justice; the logical structure of rights-talk; the bases of human rights, their specification and their limits; authority, and the formation of authoritative rules by non-authoritative persons and procedures; law, the Rule of Law, and the derivation of laws from the principles of practical reasonableness; the complex relation between legal and moral obligation; and the practical and theoretical problems created by unjust laws. A final Part develops a vigorous argument about the relation between 'natural law', 'natural theology' and 'revelation' - between moral concern and other ultimate questions.
Link: http://jiong.wykehamist.com/blog/2006/12/what-is-reasonableness.html 剑桥面试的时候,那个教授不断强调的一个词,是段法律条文中的“reasonable”。在John Finnis的Natural Law and Natural Rights里面,作者不断强调的一个关键词,也是“practical reasonableness...
評分Link: http://jiong.wykehamist.com/blog/2006/12/what-is-reasonableness.html 剑桥面试的时候,那个教授不断强调的一个词,是段法律条文中的“reasonable”。在John Finnis的Natural Law and Natural Rights里面,作者不断强调的一个关键词,也是“practical reasonableness...
評分Link: http://jiong.wykehamist.com/blog/2006/12/what-is-reasonableness.html 剑桥面试的时候,那个教授不断强调的一个词,是段法律条文中的“reasonable”。在John Finnis的Natural Law and Natural Rights里面,作者不断强调的一个关键词,也是“practical reasonableness...
評分此书所犯下的错误同时也是其最深刻之处。 一、古代自然法的根基在于形而上学,在于对终极真理/终极善的把握;而现代自然法的根基在于实践理性。但是,具体而言,究竟是实践理性的纯粹形式的自我立法,还是实践理性对某些基础价值的证认?作者在此反对康德,认肯后一个方案。这...
評分贊同對實踐理性的基本判斷,但很難同意自然法第一原則來自self evidence而非推演,也無法同意自然法(內容)與自然法理論(體係)可以分離。權威一章很齣彩。提齣討論法律的focal meaning和肖爾的typical meaning可謂同道。
评分明確意識到瞭自然法需要麵對的每一個重要挑戰,對現代知識架構帶來的根本問題作瞭細緻辨析,充分利用瞭當代實踐哲學的可取資源,在古典權威麵前不卑不亢。非常全麵、深刻的辯護。
评分Do not do evil in the hope that good may come after it.
评分還有什麼可以說的呢?最近三十年最重要的自然法理論著作有兩本,一本是Natural Law and Natural Rights另一本是Natural Law and Natural Rights的第二版。正如中國最好的法學院是中國政法大學法學院,第二好的是中國政法大學其他法學院。
评分明確意識到瞭自然法需要麵對的每一個重要挑戰,對現代知識架構帶來的根本問題作瞭細緻辨析,充分利用瞭當代實踐哲學的可取資源,在古典權威麵前不卑不亢。非常全麵、深刻的辯護。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有