美国法的变迁：1780-1860，ISBN：9787562027089，作者：（美）莫顿·J.霍维茨（Morton J.Horwitz）著；谢鸿飞译
具体描述
读后感
“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
评分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
用户评价
我希望看到像本书这种高质量的美国的专业史，专题史，各个领域的。现在美国通史多，滥，没有意义。
评分对普通法财产权变迁的分析相当到位
评分专题美国法律史
评分对普通法财产权变迁的分析相当到位
评分其实读的不是这个版本，但内容没区别就权且这么记录了。一部经典的法律史作品，主要讲两个问题一条主线:一是法律是在不断演变的，二是美国法律的演进是工具主义的，即为了美国的经济发展而服务。所以主线就是经济发展。说说我以为的不足:不是说经济发展作为演进的动力有什么问题，而是觉得这种单一线性关系不足以支撑法律史的进程。本书暗示了从经济发展到法律制定的单向关系以及，暗示了法律的演变始终落后于经济发展的脚步，这可能不是那么太符合历史甚至，可以说是隐含了用先后顺序部分代替因果关系的问题。而最新的制度研究其实也说明了诸如法律这样的制度和经济之间的关系是复杂的，可能更类似福格尔说的协同演化。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有