美國法的變遷：1780-1860，ISBN：9787562027089，作者：（美）莫頓·J.霍維茨（Morton J.Horwitz）著；謝鴻飛譯
具體描述
讀後感
“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
評分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
評分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
評分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
評分“Legal historians and theorists are in nearly complete agreement that the non-instrumental views of the common law . . . held sway through the eighteenth century. They agree also that the instrumental view of law took hold in the course of the twentieth ce...
用戶評價
法律史研究的經典敘述模式，案例材料證明非常高密度和有說服力，提煉到法律和社會互動的高度，不單單是論製度本身，且開頭結尾都有思想史的點題和升華。是高老師上專題文獻時候的精讀推薦本
评分第一次接觸法律史，非常有啓發。
评分其實讀的不是這個版本，但內容沒區彆就權且這麼記錄瞭。一部經典的法律史作品，主要講兩個問題一條主綫:一是法律是在不斷演變的，二是美國法律的演進是工具主義的，即為瞭美國的經濟發展而服務。所以主綫就是經濟發展。說說我以為的不足:不是說經濟發展作為演進的動力有什麼問題，而是覺得這種單一綫性關係不足以支撐法律史的進程。本書暗示瞭從經濟發展到法律製定的單嚮關係以及，暗示瞭法律的演變始終落後於經濟發展的腳步，這可能不是那麼太符閤曆史甚至，可以說是隱含瞭用先後順序部分代替因果關係的問題。而最新的製度研究其實也說明瞭諸如法律這樣的製度和經濟之間的關係是復雜的，可能更類似福格爾說的協同演化。
评分對普通法財産權變遷的分析相當到位
评分第一次接觸法律史，非常有啓發。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有