States and Social Revolutions

States and Social Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2026

出版者:Cambridge University Press
作者:Theda Skocpol
出品人:
页数:420
译者:
出版时间:1979-2-28
价格:USD 44.99
装帧:Paperback
isbn号码:9780521294997
丛书系列:
图书标签:
  • 政治学
  • 社会学
  • 历史社会学
  • 政治社会学
  • HistoricalSociology
  • 比较政治
  • 政治
  • Revolution
  • 政治学
  • 社会革命
  • 国家理论
  • 历史变革
  • 阶级斗争
  • 现代社会
  • 革命运动
  • 权力结构
  • 意识形态
  • 社会变迁
想要找书就要到 图书目录大全
立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页
你会得到大惊喜!!

具体描述

This is a 1979 book by political scientist and sociologist Theda Skocpol, published by Cambridge University Press and explaining the causes of revolutions through the structural functionalism sociological paradigm comparative historical analysis of the French Revolution of 1787 through the early 19th century French Revolution, the Russian Revolution of 1917 through the 1930s Russian Revolution and the Chinese Revolution of 1911 through the 1960s Cultural Revolution. Skocpol argues that these three cases, despite being spread over a century and a half, are similar in the sense that all three were Social Revolutions

Skocpol asserts that Social Revolutions are rapid and basic transformations of a society's state and class structures. This is different from, for example, a mere 'rebellion' which merely involves a revolt of subordinate classes but may not create structural change and from a Political Revolution that may change state structures but not social structures. Industrialization can transform social structure but not change the political structure. What is unique about Social Revolutions, she says, is that basic changes in social structure and political structure occur in a mutually reinforcing fashion and these changes occur through intense sociopolitical conflict.

作者简介

THEDA SKOCPOL (PhD, Harvard, 1975) is the Victor S. Thomas Professor of Government and Sociology at Harvard University. At Harvard, she has served as Dean of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences (2005-2007) and as Director of the Center for American Political Studies (2000-2006). In 1996, Skocpol served as President of the Social Science History Association, an interdisciplinary professional group, and in 2002-03, she served as President of the American Political Science Association during the centennial of this leading professional body. In 2007, she was awarded the Johan Skytte Prize in Political Science for her "visionary analysis of the significance of the state for revolutions, welfare, and political trust, pursued with theoretical depth and empirical evidence." The Skytte Prize is one of the largest and most prestigious in political science and is awarded annually by the Skytte Foundation at Uppsala University (Sweden) to the scholar who in the view of the foundation has made the most valuable contribution to the discipline. Skocpol has also been elected to membership in all three major U.S. interdisciplinary honor societies: the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (elected 1994), the American Philosophical Society (elected 2006), and the National Academy of Sciences (elected 2008).

Skocpol's work covers an unusually broad spectrum of topics including both comparative politics (States and Social Revolutions, 1979) and American politics (Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States, 1992). Among her other works are Bringing the State Back In (1985, with Peter Evans and Dietrich Rueschemeyer); Social Policy in the United States (1995); Boomerang: Clinton's Health Security Effort and the Turn Against Government in US Politics (1996); Civic Engagement in American Democracy (1999, with Morris Fiorina); Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life (2003); Inequality and American Democracy: What We Know and What We Need to Learn (2005, with Lawrence R. Jacobs); What a Mighty Power We Can Be: African American Fraternal Groups and The Struggle for Racial Equality (2006, with Ariane Liazos and Marshall Ganz); and The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (2007, with Paul Pierson). Her books and articles have been widely cited in political science literature and have won numerous awards, including the 1993 Woodrow Wilson Award of the American Political Science Association for the best book in political science for the previous year. Skocpol's research focuses on U.S. social policy and civic engagement in American democracy, including changes since the 1960s. She has recently launched new projects on the development of U.S. higher education and on the transformations of U.S. federal policies in the Obama era.

目录信息

读后感

评分

2016年5月10日 《国家与社会革命》 ……我不能要求一个政治作家是一个作家……然而真的太蛋疼了……什么鬼描述,绝对是普通人看完也全无印象的类型……发现看了三本都是这个蛋疼法。 只能挑感兴趣的章节细读。不然看不进去。 那么少人对政治感兴趣,难道也有这个原因?我想到那...

评分

想写书评但书放在办公室里了,全凭记忆来了,如果有记错的地方欢迎指出。 上发展研究的老师曾经给学生放过一段Skocpol的采访录像,其中谈到她那本State and Social Revolution出版之后引起的巨大争议。“正统”的社会学家认为她研究的case太少变量太多,因而不科学(失去了太...  

评分

研究生院的方法课是一种蛮奇怪的存在。就像其他的graduate seminar一样,课上基本上不告诉你任何定论,而是把你当作成熟的研究者,直接把你带入到学术圈重要的辩论中去。但对于一个急切的想知道做研究是什么样子的、怎么上手做研究的一年级学生来说,直接读那种在方法论上吵来...  

评分

近五百年来的各国历史,基本上就是它们如何实现现代化的历史。这其中有一个不容忽视的现象,即荷兰、英国、美国、日本等海洋型国家的转变完成得比较顺利,而三个大陆型国家法、俄、中,则都是在经过长期痛苦、代价高昂的流血革命之后,才最终脱胎换骨,完成对国家和社会的重新...  

评分

人们为什么起来革命?当我们检视世界漫长的历史,尤其是当我们面对着生活在中国大地上坚忍沉默的农民和他们的生活时,这个问题看起来更加不那么简单和引人入胜。这是斯考契波的著作《国家与社会革命》何以引人关注的原因之一,而本书的副标题“对法国、俄国和中国的比较...  

用户评价

评分

花很多精力读完; very ambitious; justify comparison by defining social revolutions, by taking a non-voluntarist, structural perspective, and most importantly, seeing the state as an autonomous structure; because of these, three revolutions, their causes and outcomes can be compared. political crises+peasant revolts-->more centralized, bureaucratic state.

评分

definitely classic。Taking a retrospection, It's Skocpol who brought me into the academic world.

评分

比较历史社会学的开山之作,可以说是提供了新的方法和视野,居功至伟。但是仍然有不少槽点,例如斯考切波过于想要把实证规律镶嵌在宏大叙事中;对“科学性”过于执着的追求导致了历史过程中的种种曲折与异质性被忽视;把史学研究当做给自己搬砖的从而忽视史料,令叙事过于空泛

评分

比较历史社会学的开山之作,可以说是提供了新的方法和视野,居功至伟。但是仍然有不少槽点,例如斯考切波过于想要把实证规律镶嵌在宏大叙事中;对“科学性”过于执着的追求导致了历史过程中的种种曲折与异质性被忽视;把史学研究当做给自己搬砖的从而忽视史料,令叙事过于空泛

评分

花很多精力读完; very ambitious; justify comparison by defining social revolutions, by taking a non-voluntarist, structural perspective, and most importantly, seeing the state as an autonomous structure; because of these, three revolutions, their causes and outcomes can be compared. political crises+peasant revolts-->more centralized, bureaucratic state.

本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度google,bing,sogou

© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有