This extended essay by one of the world's leading historians seeks, in its first part, to excavate, and to vindicate, the neo-Roman theory of free citizens and free states as it developed in early-modern Britain. This analysis leads on to a powerful defence of the nature, purposes and goals of intellectual history and the history of ideas. As Quentin Skinner says, 'the intellectual historian can help us to appreciate how far the values embodied in our present way of life, and our present ways of thinking about those values, reflect a series of choices made at different times between different possible worlds'. This essay thus provides one of the most substantial statements yet made about the importance, relevance and potential excitement of this form of historical enquiry. Liberty before Liberalism is based on Quentin Skinner's Inaugural Lecture as Regius Professor of Modern History in the University of Cambridge, delivered in November 1997. Professor Skinner has been awarded the Balzan Prize Life Time Achievement Award for Political Thought, History and Theory. Full details of this award can be found at http://www.balzan.it/News_eng.aspx?ID=2474
具體描述
讀後感
郑友仁： 《自由主义之前的自由》中译本指谬 2003年底在学术界颇有口碑的上海三联书店推出了英国著名思想史家昆廷·斯金纳（Quentin Skinner）教授的重要著作《自由主义之前的自由》（Liberty Before Liberalism，Cambridge University Press，1998）的中译本（译者为华东师范...
評分不包括意思正确但文法不通的地方, 也不包括已经在这篇文章里指出过的错误: http://www.douban.com/subject/discussion/1018247/ 第5页: 误: “霍布斯认为, 正是法律的力量才让你的自然自由不受伤害” 正: “霍布斯认为, 即使是法律的强制力量也没有伤害你的自然自由” 误:...
評分 評分郑友仁： 《自由主义之前的自由》中译本指谬 2003年底在学术界颇有口碑的上海三联书店推出了英国著名思想史家昆廷·斯金纳（Quentin Skinner）教授的重要著作《自由主义之前的自由》（Liberty Before Liberalism，Cambridge University Press，1998）的中译本（译者为华东师范...
用戶評價
Skinner真是好讀得有點過分瞭，一個學者能把學術講得這麼清楚明白本身就是一大功力。雖然Skinner批判我喜愛的Berlin老頭子，但確實批判的在理啊。最後一章講曆史學的意義，to prevent bewitchment, to liberate us from the grip of any hegemonal account of values, 醍醐灌頂。
评分Skinner真是好讀得有點過分瞭，一個學者能把學術講得這麼清楚明白本身就是一大功力。雖然Skinner批判我喜愛的Berlin老頭子，但確實批判的在理啊。最後一章講曆史學的意義，to prevent bewitchment, to liberate us from the grip of any hegemonal account of values, 醍醐灌頂。
评分Namier-Butterfield-Pocock的史學史問題隨處可見，“自由”問題則明顯展露齣Berlin觀念的過量溢齣。頗受前代影響的學術關懷，也許纔是Skinner總是拋棄處於顯著地位的清教-神學論爭，而換之以所謂“新羅馬”的真實原因。
评分應該早點讀。
评分Namier-Butterfield-Pocock的史學史問題隨處可見，“自由”問題則明顯展露齣Berlin觀念的過量溢齣。頗受前代影響的學術關懷，也許纔是Skinner總是拋棄處於顯著地位的清教-神學論爭，而換之以所謂“新羅馬”的真實原因。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有