Electrifying when they were first delivered in 1973, becoming legendary in the years since, as transcripts passed from hand to hand, Dieter Henrich's lectures on German idealism were the first contact a major German philosopher had made with an American audience since the onset of World War II. They remain, to this day, one of the most eloquent interpretations of the central philosophical tradition of Germany and the way in which it relates to the concerns of contemporary philosophy. Thanks to the editorial work of David Pacini, one of the original auditors of Henrich's course, the lectures appear here with annotations that link them to the editions of the masterworks of German philosophy as they are now available. </p>
Henrich describes the movement that led from Kant to Hegel, beginning with an interpretation of the structure and tensions of Kant's system. He locates the Kantian movement and revival of Spinoza, as sketched by F. H. Jacobi, in the intellectual conditions of the time and in the philosophical motivations of modern thought. And he explains the motives behind Fichte's Doctrine of Science. Henrich connects this history to the poet Hölderlin's original philosophy and to the thought of the founders of Romanticism, Novalis and Friedrich Schlegel. He concludes with an interpretation of the basic design of Hegel's system. </p>
因为在台大上彭文本老师的德国观念论,才知道Dieter Henrich这个人,才开始看《在康德与黑格尔之间》这本书。在序言一开始,Henrich就向读者指出从1781年康德出版第一批判,到1804年他死去时,黑格尔已经建立自己的哲学体系,德国观念论在18世纪最后的二十年里完成了从康德,穿...
評分因为在台大上彭文本老师的德国观念论,才知道Dieter Henrich这个人,才开始看《在康德与黑格尔之间》这本书。在序言一开始,Henrich就向读者指出从1781年康德出版第一批判,到1804年他死去时,黑格尔已经建立自己的哲学体系,德国观念论在18世纪最后的二十年里完成了从康德,穿...
評分第220页,“...and it is a longing for the perfect self, for the entirely independent self. Indeed, it is a yearning for the ultimate overcoming of all limitations imposed by the not-self. In its actuality, longing operates in our mind in a way that is nothi...
評分第220页,“...and it is a longing for the perfect self, for the entirely independent self. Indeed, it is a yearning for the ultimate overcoming of all limitations imposed by the not-self. In its actuality, longing operates in our mind in a way that is nothi...
評分因为在台大上彭文本老师的德国观念论,才知道Dieter Henrich这个人,才开始看《在康德与黑格尔之间》这本书。在序言一开始,Henrich就向读者指出从1781年康德出版第一批判,到1804年他死去时,黑格尔已经建立自己的哲学体系,德国观念论在18世纪最后的二十年里完成了从康德,穿...
夾在思想裏程碑間的人物可能自相矛盾甚至不成體係,卻構成瞭全部轉摺瞬間的肌理,小道可觀~
评分讀瞭講費希特的幾章,作者很有些高見,其中論證費希特是第一位現代神學傢的一節尤其令人印象深刻。由於是講稿,非常的易讀。其他章節粗看來也很好,隻是對謝林似乎著墨很有限,留待以後。
评分黑格爾這個蕩婦把她扔進希特勒和瓦格拉的舊紙堆就可以瞭,康德和尼采之間真正的材料,是海洋革命戰爭是民族獨立和現代國傢的野外探索,是科技的狂飆突進,是詩歌狀態的壯美,黑格爾隻不過是活在教育部裏操老婆的心知肚明,他做得很好,但是他調用的是德意誌民族那種害羞和依賴的婦性,這種粘稠的溫暖讓地中海走遍太平洋開始嘗試切割亞洲銅時,如同一場月經打在瞭真相上稀裏嘩啦,說這麼多的意思很簡單,我要來承接德意誌風格
评分I. The systematic structure of Kant's philosophy
评分亨利希早期的研究。按照Henrich本人的說法,很多論證還不詳實。建議參看Henrich後期的一本Konstellationen:Probleme und Debatten am Ursprung der idealistischen Philosophie(1789-1795)
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有