Modern philosophy finds it difficult to give a satisfactory picture of the place of minds in the world. In "Mind and World", based on the 1991 John Locke Lectures, John McDowell offers his diagnosis of this difficulty and points to a cure. He illustrates a major problem of modern philosophy - the insidious persistence of dualism - in his discussion of empirical thought. Much as we would like to conceive empirical thought as rationally grounded in experience, pitfalls await anyone who tries to articulate this position, and McDowell exposes these traps by exploiting the work of contemporary philosophers from Wilfrid Sellars to Donald Davidson. These difficulties, he contends, reflect an understandable - but surmountable - failure to see how we might integrate what Sellars calls "the logical space of reasons" into the natural world. What underlies this impasse is a conception of nature that has certain attractions for the modern age, a conception that McDowell proposes to put aside, thus circumventing these philosophical difficulties. By returning to a pre-modern conception of nature but retaining the intellectual advance of modernity that has mistakenly been viewed as dislodging it, he makes room for a fully satisfying conception of experience as a rational openness to independent reality. This approach also overcomes other obstacles that impede a generally satisfying understanding of how we are placed in the world.
具體描述
讀後感
麦克道威尔通过将世界构想为由可思物（the thinkable）所构成来消除心灵与世界的间隙。既然世界（先验地）由可思物构成，那么当我们真切地（truly）思考时，心灵内容——作为真的可思物（true thinkables）——便同一于事实。如其知识论析取主义所说，真知与幻觉的差别，就在于...
評分塞拉斯对于所与神话的批判与戴维森对于经验论的第三个教条也即‘概念图式-经验内容’二元论的形成对应。 现代哲学忧虑的根源，是两种力量的对立关系：1，最低限度的经验论：思想对经验世界的指向的思想只有按照对经验法庭的可应答性才是可以理解的，也只有按照使其本身对感知...
評分塞拉斯对于所与神话的批判与戴维森对于经验论的第三个教条也即‘概念图式-经验内容’二元论的形成对应。 现代哲学忧虑的根源，是两种力量的对立关系：1，最低限度的经验论：思想对经验世界的指向的思想只有按照对经验法庭的可应答性才是可以理解的，也只有按照使其本身对感知...
評分麦克道威尔通过将世界构想为由可思物（the thinkable）所构成来消除心灵与世界的间隙。既然世界（先验地）由可思物构成，那么当我们真切地（truly）思考时，心灵内容——作为真的可思物（true thinkables）——便同一于事实。如其知识论析取主义所说，真知与幻觉的差别，就在于...
評分塞拉斯对于所与神话的批判与戴维森对于经验论的第三个教条也即‘概念图式-经验内容’二元论的形成对应。 现代哲学忧虑的根源，是两种力量的对立关系：1，最低限度的经验论：思想对经验世界的指向的思想只有按照对经验法庭的可应答性才是可以理解的，也只有按照使其本身对感知...
用戶評價
兩個最大的問題：1、麥兜自己的說法是second nature隻是一個reminder 一如維特根斯坦的梯子 他不願對這個概念作substantial analysis 每當有人要求他給齣一份對second nature的詳細論述時他就開始打哈哈 目前情況是 謝林黑格爾式的自然哲學傢不接受他的說法 皮平不接受他的說法 bold naturalist不接受他的說法 對他態度比較溫和的人比如泰勒 最多也隻是“大方嚮我同意啦但是…” 2、占瞭書名半壁江山的world在書裏從未被主題化 對他來說 world概念是完全自明的無須作澄清… 他傢康德都不會如此隨意對待這個問題好嗎 另外讀這本書時手邊要有他的mind value and reality作參照 其中許多文章是對MaW個彆章節的拓展
评分德國觀念論終於在100年後藉（麥兜的）維特根斯坦之手重迴分析哲學。
评分三章車軲轆話之後措不及防搬齣Gadamer...上網課胖胖的椅子沒塌
评分1.Kantian insight: empirical knowledge is impossible without the combination between the understanding and the sensibility. So taken, the conceptual capacities already operated in experience, the empirical content is conceptual rather than the Given. So experience can play justificatory role. 2. The worry that drives some to appeal to the Given is
评分1.Kantian insight: empirical knowledge is impossible without the combination between the understanding and the sensibility. So taken, the conceptual capacities already operated in experience, the empirical content is conceptual rather than the Given. So experience can play justificatory role. 2. The worry that drives some to appeal to the Given is
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有