The New Historicism has helped to remove traditional barriers separating literary criticism and historiography, in part by replacing the fact-finding model of historical study with a descriptive and narrative model. Using 'literature' as a source and a method, the new historiographers write narratives no longer bound to 'realism' but rather favouring postmodernist and post-structuralist strategies. Certain questions have also arisen: how, for example, is the New Historicism articulated with other movements that have radicalized or politicized the profession, such as Marxism, Feminism, and Third World ideology critique? By what protocols are New Historicist texts to be judged? Those of historiography, or those of emerging disciplines such as ethnoscience, componential analysis, cognitive anthropology, or even postmodern architecture and performance art? The volume represents the state of the art in New Historicism and is designed to engage a broad-based readership. The essays address the emergence of the 'Third World' as a signifier, the relationship of feminism and New Historicism, the disappearance of the category 'class' in New Historicism, and the corrolary rise of 'class' and the Marxist grand recit , as categories in British Cultural materialism. The volume represents, in sum, a useful expansion of the current debate and breaks important new ground.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
這本集子有不少篇幅討論新曆史主義是不是馬剋思主義的變體，因為注重同樣在物質層麵，也有人質疑“新”到底在何處。但討論範疇多還在文藝復興期間。
评分這本集子有不少篇幅討論新曆史主義是不是馬剋思主義的變體，因為注重同樣在物質層麵，也有人質疑“新”到底在何處。但討論範疇多還在文藝復興期間。
评分這本集子有不少篇幅討論新曆史主義是不是馬剋思主義的變體，因為注重同樣在物質層麵，也有人質疑“新”到底在何處。但討論範疇多還在文藝復興期間。
评分這本集子有不少篇幅討論新曆史主義是不是馬剋思主義的變體，因為注重同樣在物質層麵，也有人質疑“新”到底在何處。但討論範疇多還在文藝復興期間。
评分這本集子有不少篇幅討論新曆史主義是不是馬剋思主義的變體，因為注重同樣在物質層麵，也有人質疑“新”到底在何處。但討論範疇多還在文藝復興期間。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有