Jan-Werner Müller is Professor of Politics at Princeton University. He is author of several books, most recently Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth Century Europe. He contributes regularly to London Review of Books, the Guardian, and the New York Review of Books.
Donald Trump, Silvio Berlusconi, Marine Le Pen, Hugo Chávez—populists are on the rise across the globe. But what exactly is populism? Should everyone who criticizes Wall Street or Washington be called a populist? What precisely is the difference between right-wing and left-wing populism? Does populism bring government closer to the people or is it a threat to democracy? Who are "the people" anyway and who can speak in their name? These questions have never been more pressing.
In this groundbreaking volume, Jan-Werner Müller argues that at populism's core is a rejection of pluralism. Populists will always claim that they and they alone represent the people and their true interests. Müller also shows that, contrary to conventional wisdom, populists can govern on the basis of their claim to exclusive moral representation of the people: if populists have enough power, they will end up creating an authoritarian state that excludes all those not considered part of the proper "people." The book proposes a number of concrete strategies for how liberal democrats should best deal with populists and, in particular, how to counter their claims to speak exclusively for "the silent majority" or "the real people."
Analytical, accessible, and provocative, What Is Populism? is grounded in history and draws on examples from Latin America, Europe, and the United States to define the characteristics of populism and the deeper causes of its electoral successes in our time.
按:在世界范围内,民粹主义政治领袖们被纷纷选上台,是因为人民都是乌合之众、需要威权统治吗?研究民粹主义的普林斯顿大学政治学教授扬-威尔纳·穆勒(Jan-Werner Muller)认为,人民只是按照选举框架在投票,只是这个框架内代表进步力量的一方已经信用尽失。而同样,民粹主...
評分「民粹主义根植于代议制民主的代表逻辑之中」,这是JWM在What Is Populism中试图展开的一个观点。JWM的贡献当然不在于观察到了这一点——这个观察至少可以上溯到19世纪一直到20世纪初政治理论中对自由主义代议制的批评里。当然,JWM对这个观察做了符合时代环境也符合逻辑的细化...
評分「民粹主义根植于代议制民主的代表逻辑之中」,这是JWM在What Is Populism中试图展开的一个观点。JWM的贡献当然不在于观察到了这一点——这个观察至少可以上溯到19世纪一直到20世纪初政治理论中对自由主义代议制的批评里。当然,JWM对这个观察做了符合时代环境也符合逻辑的细化...
評分按:在世界范围内,民粹主义政治领袖们被纷纷选上台,是因为人民都是乌合之众、需要威权统治吗?研究民粹主义的普林斯顿大学政治学教授扬-威尔纳·穆勒(Jan-Werner Muller)认为,人民只是按照选举框架在投票,只是这个框架内代表进步力量的一方已经信用尽失。而同样,民粹主...
評分按:在世界范围内,民粹主义政治领袖们被纷纷选上台,是因为人民都是乌合之众、需要威权统治吗?研究民粹主义的普林斯顿大学政治学教授扬-威尔纳·穆勒(Jan-Werner Muller)认为,人民只是按照选举框架在投票,只是这个框架内代表进步力量的一方已经信用尽失。而同样,民粹主...
若想藉此書來瞭解西方近年來民粹主義政治崛起的根源,那麼此書並未提供答案,因為作者沒有涉及到政治經濟學分析。僅從政治哲學的進路來界定民粹主義,不免有點隔靴搔癢。
评分若想藉此書來瞭解西方近年來民粹主義政治崛起的根源,那麼此書並未提供答案,因為作者沒有涉及到政治經濟學分析。僅從政治哲學的進路來界定民粹主義,不免有點隔靴搔癢。
评分關於populism讀的第一本書。因為本來這方麵的知識是空白,讀下來感覺還不錯。篇幅比較小,論述也比較耐讀(沒有那種標準學術作品的枯燥感),最後還總結瞭7個“命題”, 可以說對讀者很友好瞭。
评分關於populism讀的第一本書。因為本來這方麵的知識是空白,讀下來感覺還不錯。篇幅比較小,論述也比較耐讀(沒有那種標準學術作品的枯燥感),最後還總結瞭7個“命題”, 可以說對讀者很友好瞭。
评分從幾乎是純政治哲學的角度展開的分析,還是蠻有道理的。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有