2016年中国民族学学会高层论坛由中国民族学学会、宁夏大学、宁夏社会科学界联合主办,由宁夏大学政法学院、阿拉伯学院承办。中国学界一直提倡在马克思主义基础上,特别是在世界观和方法论上,以历史唯物主义,辩证唯物主义为指导,结合中国本土特色,建设社会科学的各学科,尽管我们已经形成了自己的一些特点,但是,一个马克思主义的有中国特色的民族学人类学学派尚未形成。中国的人类学民族学仍然是以西方学界的理论方法为主要依托的学科。作为一个具有80多年历史的老学会,中国学派的建立任重道远,是中国民族学会的历史使命。
王延中,山东东平人。北京大学社会学博士,中国社会科学院民族学与人类学研究所所长、研究员,《民族研究》主编,中国社会科学院研究生院教授,中国人民大学等高校兼职教授,兼任中国民族研究团体联合会会长、中国人类学民族学研究会副会长等学术团体负责人。曾从事工业经济、劳动社会保障、卫生政策、科研管理与廉政建设等领域研究,发表《经济组织与城乡发展》《中国的劳动与社会保障问题》等论著,主编社会保障绿皮书《中国社会保障发展报告》,目前主要从事民族理论与民族政策、民族地区发展等问题研究,主持“21世纪初中国少数民族地区经济社会发展综合调查”“民族团结云南经验”等重大项目和中国社会科学院西藏智库办公室工作,获得国务院政府特殊津贴、“新世纪百千万人才”工程国家级人选、文化名家暨“四个一批”人才、国家“万人计划”哲学社会科学领军人才等荣誉称号。
·
祁进玉,中央民族大学人类学博士,北京大学社会学博士后,现为中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院教授、博士生导师,民族学系主任、东北亚民族文化研究所所长;主要研究领域为族群性与文化研究,宗教、生态与教育人类学等。2011年入选教育部“新世纪优秀人才”;2013年入选国家民委“中青年英才”支持计划。中国民族学会常务理事兼常务副秘书长;中国民族学学会东北亚民族文化研究会秘书长;韩国庆南大学极东问题研究所访问学者(2010.6-9)、美国斯坦福大学东亚研究中心访问学者(2012.7-2013.7)、韩国东北亚历史财团海外研究学者(2014.12-2015.2)。在《中国社会科学内部文稿》、《中国社会科学文摘》、《中央民族大学学报》、《宗教学研究》等国内外核心期刊发表学术论文七十余篇;专著《群体身份与多元认同——基于三个土族社区的人类学对比研究》(2008)获第十一届北京市哲学社会科学优秀成果二等奖和国家民委第二届人文社会科学优秀成果二等奖;《历史记忆与认同重构:土族民族识别的历史人类学研究》(学苑出版社,2015,获2016年国家民委民族问题研究优秀成果二等奖);编著《文化研究导论》(2013)、主编《东北亚民族文化评论》等论文集8部。主持国家软科学和国家社科基金各1项,省部级科研课题6项;参与省部级科研项目4项。
感谢学会给我这么一个机会来聆听大家的讨论! 刘正爱秘书长代表杨圣敏会长邀请我,她说,会议只有30人参与,我可以随意畅谈。没有想到会议规模现在变得如此巨大。没有好好准备,有些紧张。 没有好好准备的一个原因是20世纪90年代我在北大教人类学思潮的课,这门课起初有些后现...
评分感谢学会给我这么一个机会来聆听大家的讨论! 刘正爱秘书长代表杨圣敏会长邀请我,她说,会议只有30人参与,我可以随意畅谈。没有想到会议规模现在变得如此巨大。没有好好准备,有些紧张。 没有好好准备的一个原因是20世纪90年代我在北大教人类学思潮的课,这门课起初有些后现...
评分感谢学会给我这么一个机会来聆听大家的讨论! 刘正爱秘书长代表杨圣敏会长邀请我,她说,会议只有30人参与,我可以随意畅谈。没有想到会议规模现在变得如此巨大。没有好好准备,有些紧张。 没有好好准备的一个原因是20世纪90年代我在北大教人类学思潮的课,这门课起初有些后现...
评分感谢学会给我这么一个机会来聆听大家的讨论! 刘正爱秘书长代表杨圣敏会长邀请我,她说,会议只有30人参与,我可以随意畅谈。没有想到会议规模现在变得如此巨大。没有好好准备,有些紧张。 没有好好准备的一个原因是20世纪90年代我在北大教人类学思潮的课,这门课起初有些后现...
评分感谢学会给我这么一个机会来聆听大家的讨论! 刘正爱秘书长代表杨圣敏会长邀请我,她说,会议只有30人参与,我可以随意畅谈。没有想到会议规模现在变得如此巨大。没有好好准备,有些紧张。 没有好好准备的一个原因是20世纪90年代我在北大教人类学思潮的课,这门课起初有些后现...
The title "How Ethnology Advances" immediately suggests a journey of intellectual growth and transformation. It's not about a static state of knowledge, but a continuous process of learning, questioning, and refining our understanding of human societies. My initial impulse is to consider what "advancement" entails in this specific field. Does it mean the development of more precise theoretical models that can explain complex social phenomena, or perhaps the invention of innovative research methodologies that allow us to access and interpret cultural data in new ways? I imagine the book would begin by tracing the historical lineage of ethnology, perhaps highlighting the pivotal figures and foundational texts that have shaped its trajectory. It would likely explore the major theoretical debates that have animated the discipline, from the early debates on cultural evolution to the more recent engagements with post-structuralism and critical theory. The "advances" aspect of the title also leads me to anticipate a thorough examination of methodological evolution. How have ethnographers moved beyond traditional fieldwork to incorporate new tools and approaches? Are they leveraging digital technologies for data collection and analysis, or developing innovative forms of collaborative research that empower local communities? I'm particularly interested in how ethnology engages with contemporary global issues. How does it contribute to our understanding of phenomena like migration, cultural globalization, or the impact of social media on identity formation? The title itself seems to promise a comprehensive overview of how ethnology has not only expanded its theoretical horizons but also enhanced its capacity to offer meaningful insights into the complexities of human existence.
评分当我在书架上偶然瞥见《民族学如何进步》这个名字时,一种莫名的好奇心便涌上心头。我一直对人类社会的多元性以及不同文化之间的互动着迷,而“民族学”这个词语本身就承载着一种探索未知、理解差异的魅力。然而,这本书究竟会如何“进步”?是理论的革新,研究方法的演进,还是实践层面的突破?这些问题在我脑海中盘旋,也让我对接下来的阅读充满了期待。我脑海中浮现出许多关于民族学研究的经典案例,比如早期人类学家对遥远部落的田野调查,那种深入其中、与当地人共同生活的严谨态度,以及由此带来的对人类行为模式的深刻洞察。我也会联想到现代社会中,全球化浪潮下不同文化碰撞与融合带来的复杂性,民族学是否能提供新的视角来理解这些现象?比如,随着科技的发展,虚拟社区和数字游牧民族的兴起,是否会成为民族学新的研究对象?又或者,在后殖民主义语境下,民族学如何反思其历史上的权力结构,并构建更具包容性和平等性的研究范式?这些都是我期待在这本书中找到答案的方向。我想象着作者会如何梳理民族学的发展脉络,从早期带有博物学色彩的记录,到后来的结构主义、后现代主义等思潮的冲击,再到如今更加强调在地性、反思性以及跨学科合作的趋势。我会关注书中是否会探讨民族学在伦理困境中的挣扎,例如在研究过程中如何避免对被研究者的干扰,如何平衡研究者的客观性与人文关怀。我也期待它能触及民族学在当代社会的应用,比如在文化遗产保护、跨文化沟通、国际冲突解决等领域的贡献。总之,这本书的名字本身就构成了一个引人入胜的命题,预示着一次深入的探索之旅。
评分"How Ethnology Advances" – the title alone is a beckoning call to anyone interested in the rich tapestry of human culture and social life. It promises not a static definition, but a dynamic exploration of how a field of study evolves, adapts, and deepens its understanding. I imagine the book embarking on a historical pilgrimage, charting the discipline's course from its nascent stages. Perhaps it will illuminate the contributions of early pioneers, detailing their groundbreaking fieldwork and their attempts to make sense of human diversity. I'm particularly intrigued by how ethnology has grappled with its own past, especially its entanglement with colonial histories, and how it has since strived for greater reflexivity and ethical integrity. The "advancement" aspect leads me to anticipate a thorough examination of methodological innovations. Beyond the classic ethnographic interview and observation, what cutting-edge techniques are currently employed? Are ethnologists utilizing computational methods to analyze vast datasets, or perhaps employing virtual reality to offer immersive cultural experiences for research and education? I also foresee a significant discussion on theoretical advancements. How have new philosophical currents, from post-structuralism to critical realism, influenced ethnological thought? Has there been a move towards more interdisciplinary approaches, integrating insights from sociology, anthropology, history, and even neuroscience? Moreover, the title suggests a focus on the practical implications of ethnological research. How does ethnology contribute to addressing contemporary societal issues, such as cultural preservation, conflict resolution, or promoting social justice? I anticipate concrete examples and case studies that demonstrate ethnology’s ongoing relevance and its capacity to offer profound insights into the human condition.
评分当我看到《民族学如何进步》这个书名时,我的思绪便如同被投下了一颗石子,激起了层层涟漪。我首先想到的是,所谓“进步”,必然伴随着对旧有观念的突破和对未知领域的拓展。那么,民族学这个学科,在漫长的发展过程中,是如何一步步走出自己的道路,又在哪些方面实现了它的“进步”呢? 我会想象,书中是否会详细追溯民族学思想史的脉络,从早期如赫胥黎、摩尔根等学者的奠基性工作,到博厄斯学派对文化相对主义的强调,再到后来的结构主义、符号学,直至当代对认同、权力和后殖民议题的关注。这其中的每一次理论转向,都是对既有认知的挑战和超越。 我也很期待书中能详述研究方法的创新。传统的田野调查,是如何在经验的积累中不断完善其操作规范?随着技术的发展,新的研究工具和平台(如互联网、社交媒体、虚拟现实等)是否为民族学研究带来了新的可能性?例如,如何利用大数据分析来识别社会变迁的趋势,或者如何运用数字民族志来研究虚拟社群的文化形态? 我还会关注,民族学在“进步”的过程中,如何处理与社会现实的互动。它是否能够为解决现实世界中的冲突、促进文化交流、保护濒危文化等方面提供理论支持和实践指导? 例如,在全球化背景下,不同民族的身份认同如何演变?在全球性疾病大流行期间,不同社群的应对策略有何差异?这些都是民族学能够提供独特见解的领域。总之,这本书的名字,似乎在承诺一场关于认知升级和学术突破的盛宴,让我充满期待。
评分《民族学如何进步》这个书名,一下子就抓住了我的注意力。它不是一个陈述句,而是一个充满探索意味的疑问。我immediately begin to ponder what “progress” means in the context of ethnology. Is it about refining theoretical frameworks, developing more sophisticated research methodologies, or perhaps about the discipline's increasing relevance in understanding and addressing contemporary global challenges? I envision the book delving into the historical evolution of ethnographic thought. Perhaps it will begin by tracing the discipline’s roots, from early attempts at cataloging human diversity with a somewhat colonial gaze, to the establishment of rigorous fieldwork methods and the emphasis on cultural relativism championed by figures like Franz Boas. I’d be particularly interested in learning about the paradigm shifts that have occurred – the influence of structuralism, the critiques from post-structuralism, and the emergence of feminist and postcolonial perspectives, all of which have undoubtedly reshaped how ethnology understands culture and society. Furthermore, I anticipate a thorough exploration of methodological advancements. Beyond traditional participant observation, what new tools and techniques are ethnologists employing today? Are they leveraging big data analytics to identify patterns in social behavior, utilizing digital ethnography to study online communities, or developing innovative approaches to collaborative research that empower local communities? The book’s title also suggests a focus on the practical application of ethnological knowledge. How does ethnology contribute to solving real-world problems, such as mitigating cultural conflicts, fostering intercultural understanding, or preserving endangered cultural heritage? I imagine the author might present case studies illustrating ethnology’s impact in areas like public health, urban planning, or international development. The title itself acts as a powerful invitation, promising a deep dive into the dynamic and evolving nature of our understanding of humanity.
评分《民族学如何进步》这个书名,在我看来,充满了学术的张力与现实的关切。我脑海中立刻浮现出无数关于人类文明演进的片段,从古老部落的仪式到现代都市的霓虹,从语言的变迁到信仰的重塑,这一切都构成了民族学广阔的研究领域。我好奇的是,这本书将如何描绘这幅宏伟画卷中的“进步”轨迹?它是否会从理论的层面,梳理民族学研究思想的演变,比如从早期实证主义的客观观察,到解释学转向下的意义探寻,再到后现代主义对宏大叙事的解构与反思?又或者,它会侧重于研究方法的创新?我想象着,作者可能会详述田野调查如何从“闯入”式转向“协商式”,如何利用数字技术捕捉更细腻的社会互动,或者如何将定量与定性方法相结合,以获得更丰富的数据和更深刻的洞察。 此外,我也对民族学在当代的社会功能充满好奇。它是否仅仅是学术象牙塔中的理论游戏,还是能够真正介入现实,解决社会问题?比如,在文化冲突日益加剧的今天,民族学能否提供跨文化理解的桥梁?在民族主义思潮涌动的世界里,它是否能帮助我们看到人类共同体的可能性? 我也期待书中能探讨民族学研究中的伦理挑战。在研究过程中,研究者如何平衡自身的立场与被研究者的权益?如何在尊重文化多样性的同时,避免对弱势群体的剥削和污名化?这些都是民族学在“进步”过程中必须面对的严峻课题。这本书的名字,在我看来,就像一个邀请,邀请我一同踏上这场关于人类理解与自我认识的深刻旅程。
评分拿到《民族学如何进步》这本书,首先吸引我的是它所蕴含的“进步”二字。这不仅仅是一个学术领域的名称,更暗示着一种持续的演进和超越。我很好奇,作者会从哪个角度来阐述民族学的“进步”?是理论框架的日臻完善,还是研究方法的日新月异?亦或是它在回应时代挑战、解决现实问题上的能力不断增强? 我设想着,也许书中会详细介绍民族学研究范式从宏大叙事向微观分析的转变,从早期对“他者”的猎奇式描摹,到如今对社会结构、权力关系以及个体经验的深度挖掘。会不会涉及一些突破性的研究方法?比如,利用大数据分析来理解群体行为模式,或者通过参与式观察和合作研究来赋权被研究者,让他们在研究过程中拥有更多的话语权。我还会期待书中能够探讨民族学在不同历史时期所扮演的角色。在殖民主义时期,民族学似乎与权力紧密相连,其研究成果常被用于理解和管理殖民地人民。那么,在后殖民时代,民族学又是如何自我反思和重塑的?它如何摆脱过去的羁绊,走向更具批判性和解放性的研究道路?另外,我也想知道,书中会不会讨论民族学与其他学科的交叉融合。比如,它如何借鉴社会学、心理学、历史学、语言学等学科的理论和方法,以构建更全面的理解人类社会的能力?或者,民族学的理论和方法又如何反哺这些学科,带来新的启发? 总之,这本书的名字就像一个信号,指引着我前往一个充满探索和发现的学术前沿。
评分When I encountered the title "How Ethnology Advances," my mind immediately went to the dynamic nature of academic disciplines. It’s not enough for a field to simply exist; it must evolve, adapt, and refine its understanding of the world. I'm incredibly curious to explore what "advancement" truly means in the context of ethnology. Does it involve the creation of new theoretical frameworks that offer fresh perspectives on human behavior and social organization? Or is it more about the development of sophisticated research tools and techniques that allow for deeper, more nuanced investigations into cultural phenomena? I imagine the book delving into the historical trajectory of ethnographic inquiry. It might start by examining the early efforts to systematically document human diversity, perhaps discussing the influence of Enlightenment thought and the development of early classificatory systems. I would then anticipate a discussion of the paradigm shifts that have reshaped the field, such as the move from evolutionary perspectives to cultural relativism, and the subsequent emergence of interpretive and critical approaches that highlight the subjective nature of experience and the role of power in shaping cultural meanings. The title also strongly suggests a focus on methodological innovations. Are ethnologists employing new technologies, like digital ethnography or the analysis of big data, to understand contemporary social trends? How have ethical considerations evolved, leading to more collaborative and participatory research practices that respect the agency of those being studied? I’m also keen to understand how ethnology continues to contribute to understanding and addressing pressing global issues, from cultural preservation to intercultural conflict.
评分The title, "How Ethnology Advances," immediately conjures a sense of intellectual momentum and discovery. It suggests a narrative of progress, of a discipline continually pushing the boundaries of its understanding of human societies. My initial thought is to consider the very definition of "advancement" in an academic context. Is it about developing more robust theoretical models, pioneering novel research methodologies, or perhaps about the discipline's increasing ability to engage with and inform pressing global issues? I envision the book tracing the historical evolution of ethnographic thought, perhaps beginning with the foundational work of early scholars and their attempts to systematically study human cultures. I would be eager to learn about the pivotal theoretical shifts that have occurred – the impact of cultural evolutionism, the subsequent critiques that led to functionalism and structuralism, and the more recent emergence of interpretive and critical approaches that emphasize meaning-making and power relations. Furthermore, the "advances" implied by the title likely extend to methodological innovations. I anticipate a detailed exploration of how ethnographers have refined their techniques for data collection and analysis, perhaps discussing the integration of digital tools, the rise of visual ethnography, or the development of collaborative research models that empower local voices. I also expect the book to address ethnology's growing engagement with contemporary social challenges. How is ethnology contributing to our understanding of globalization, migration, identity politics, or the impact of technological change on human interaction? The title itself suggests a forward-looking perspective, promising an insightful account of how ethnology continues to evolve and remain relevant in a rapidly changing world.
评分The title, "How Ethnology Advances," immediately sparks my curiosity. It suggests a journey, an unfolding narrative of intellectual development and discovery within a fascinating academic field. My mind immediately races to consider what "advancement" might entail for ethnology. Does it signify the refinement of its theoretical underpinnings, perhaps moving beyond earlier, potentially ethnocentric, interpretations of human societies? Or does it point towards groundbreaking shifts in research methodologies, the adoption of new technologies, or innovative approaches to engaging with the very communities that ethnology seeks to understand? I picture the book dissecting the historical trajectory of ethnological thought, potentially exploring the transition from early, descriptive accounts of "exotic" cultures to more nuanced, critical analyses of power dynamics, social structures, and individual experiences. I’m eager to learn about the theoretical revolutions that have shaped the discipline – how concepts like cultural diffusion, acculturation, and later, the influence of linguistic and semiotic theories, have altered our perception of cultural processes. Furthermore, I anticipate a detailed examination of methodological innovations. Are ethnologists now employing digital tools for data collection and analysis? How have ethical considerations evolved, leading to more collaborative and participatory research practices? I’m keen to understand how ethnology navigates the complexities of studying contemporary global issues, such as migration, globalization, and the impact of digital technologies on human interaction. The title itself seems to promise an exploration of how ethnology has not only grown in theoretical sophistication but also in its capacity to provide meaningful insights into the ever-changing tapestry of human existence.
评分唉、
评分唉、
评分唉、
评分唉、
评分唉、
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有