Neo-Confucianism in History pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
包弼德（Peter K. Bol）是美国哈佛大学东亚语言与文明系的查理斯•卡威尔（Charles H. Carswell）讲座教授，他同时也主持哈佛大学《中国历史地理信息系统》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中国历代人物传记资料库》（Chinese Biographical Database）等大型数据库的建设工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992，中译本《斯文：唐宋思想的转型》)，并合编Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等书。包弼德最近十余年的研究专注于讨论理学的历史角色，以及从地方史的视角出发探讨中国社会文化的变迁。
- 思想史
- 海外中国研究
- 理学
- Bol
- 历史
- 包弼德
- 社会史
- 海外漢學
Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
具体描述
读后感
这本书的一个特别之处是在附录里添加了一份对于本书的书评及作者的回应。许齐雄和王昌伟在检讨了北美学界近五十年的宋明理学研究之后，指出哲学的（以狄百瑞为中心）和历史的（以余英时为代表）这两种研究路径先天就有不可避免的缺陷，前者是脱离了具体时空的种种概念的无头回...
评分 评分《历史上的理学》是第一部在公元11世纪至17世纪的政治、经济、社会和文化变迁的大背景下，详细地阐释理学的萌发、兴盛和末落的著作。 包弼德教授在进行这项研究方面具有得天独厚的优势。他对于中国政治史和社会经济史领域的前沿进展有深透的了解。他严谨地将理学界定为一种道德...
评分...抄录一些原话. ... What clearly is the case is that the court rarely again tried---and when it did, it failed---to overhaul its institutions so that the state apparatus became the active agent in transforming society in the manner of the New Policies of ...
评分用户评价
感覺是為普知大眾而寫。不過角度很新穎: neoconfunianism is not a philosophy , instead, it was more like a intellectual movement
评分读完了，想吐。
评分因為專攻非歷史，所以不好多說。但覺得只是將《斯文》裡面的觀點換了方法、補充了一些，又說了一遍
评分Neo-Confucianism as social movement, and an alternative to the New Policies. 有时间重新过一下《中国转向内在》，补笔记。往下可以无缝衔接王汎森。
评分感覺是為普知大眾而寫。不過角度很新穎: neoconfunianism is not a philosophy , instead, it was more like a intellectual movement
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有