Neo-Confucianism in History pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
包弼德（Peter K. Bol）是美国哈佛大学东亚语言与文明系的查理斯•卡威尔（Charles H. Carswell）讲座教授，他同时也主持哈佛大学《中国历史地理信息系统》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中国历代人物传记资料库》（Chinese Biographical Database）等大型数据库的建设工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992，中译本《斯文：唐宋思想的转型》)，并合编Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等书。包弼德最近十余年的研究专注于讨论理学的历史角色，以及从地方史的视角出发探讨中国社会文化的变迁。
- 思想史
- 海外中国研究
- 理学
- Bol
- 历史
- 包弼德
- 社会史
- 海外漢學
Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
具体描述
读后感
新書資訊：历史上的理学（包弼德） 历史上的理学(社会经济史译丛)(Neo-Confucianism in History) 作者:(美国)包弼德(Peter K. Bol) 译者:(新加坡)王昌伟 基本信息 ·出版社：浙江大学出版社 ·页码：307 页 ·出版日期：2010年01月 ·ISBN：9787308072106 ·条形码：9787308...
评分 评分...抄录一些原话. ... What clearly is the case is that the court rarely again tried---and when it did, it failed---to overhaul its institutions so that the state apparatus became the active agent in transforming society in the manner of the New Policies of ...
用户评价
读完了，想吐。
评分感覺是為普知大眾而寫。不過角度很新穎: neoconfunianism is not a philosophy , instead, it was more like a intellectual movement
评分Below my expectation. descriptive rather than argumentative
评分把理学的产生置于唐宋变革的社会背景下来考察，指出是对王安石新法的反动。
评分老包非常谦虚，说自己只能关注到道学如何与其身处的历史变迁相关联，不能展开讲道学本身的理论体系。成书的结果却是两方面都做的很完备。引人深思处在其对道学作为思潮、身份、社会运动的三分，以及思想体系本身的命运与其内在不协同所产生的的张力间的微妙互动。 作者的学养没得说，很多近在咫尺的推论、轻薄卖弄的类比，基本不碰。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有