Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
包弼德(Peter K. Bol)是美国哈佛大学东亚语言与文明系的查理斯•卡威尔(Charles H. Carswell)讲座教授,他同时也主持哈佛大学《中国历史地理信息系统》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中国历代人物传记资料库》(Chinese Biographical Database)等大型数据库的建设工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992,中译本《斯文:唐宋思想的转型》),并合编Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等书。包弼德最近十余年的研究专注于讨论理学的历史角色,以及从地方史的视角出发探讨中国社会文化的变迁。
包弼德在此书中试图通过构筑塑造理学的社会历史背景来理解理学发生与发展的机理,并不拘泥于将理学视作一种对人生与秩序进行终极追问的哲学理路。本书从以下几方面展开论述。 理学产生的历史社会背景 与唐朝相比,中国政治社会在宋朝呈现了完全不一样的面目,有几...
评分Taizong (r. 976-97), turned their attention to state building: defining the border, controlling independent military governors, recruiting civil administrators, regularizing tax collection and military provisioning, and re-establishing a national legal syst...
评分 评分 评分中国人在回顾历史时,最喜欢称引大唐盛世,但真正影响后世至为深远的,却是两宋奠定的政治和文化体系——借用严复的名言:“中国所以成为今日现象者,为善为恶姑不具论,而为宋人所造就,什九可断言也。”而宋朝的遗产中,最为重要的,无疑是理学:一定程度上正是它形塑了此后...
读完了,想吐。
评分前六章非常强,几乎是一气呵成。对问题讨论很细致。很多点都可以进行比较性讨论。虽然个人感觉在一些更根本的问题上对比还是略微不足,但是不可否认这本书所达到的高度。第七章就稍显逊色一些。整体行文来讲,如何用相对直白的语言来叙述和概括性总结思想史真的是很见功力。这点Bol真的很厉害。
评分資格考書目
评分把理学的产生置于唐宋变革的社会背景下来考察,指出是对王安石新法的反动。
评分strong, strong, and strong, both philosophically and historically. a great contextualization of ideas and human thinking as a historical subject following "this culture of ours." he is too strong to be imitated. one got to find one's own philosophy in order to be as insightful as him.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有