Neo-Confucianism in History pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

包弼德（Peter K. Bol）是美國哈佛大學東亞語言與文明係的查理斯•卡威爾（Charles H. Carswell）講座教授，他同時也主持哈佛大學《中國曆史地理信息係統》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中國曆代人物傳記資料庫》（Chinese Biographical Database）等大型數據庫的建設工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992，中譯本《斯文：唐宋思想的轉型》)，並閤編Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等書。包弼德最近十餘年的研究專注於討論理學的曆史角色，以及從地方史的視角齣發探討中國社會文化的變遷。

出版者:Harvard University Asia Center

作者:Peter K. Bol

出品人:

頁數:450

译者:

出版時間:2008-11-30

價格:USD 49.95

裝幀:Hardcover

isbn號碼:9780674031067

叢書系列:The Harvard East Asian Monographs

圖書標籤:

思想史
海外中國研究
理學
Bol
曆史
包弼德
社會史
海外漢學

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到圖書目錄大全

book.wenda123.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

Taizong (r. 976-97), turned their attention to state building: defining the border, controlling independent military governors, recruiting civil administrators, regularizing tax collection and military provisioning, and re-establishing a national legal syst...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

...抄录一些原话. ... What clearly is the case is that the court rarely again tried---and when it did, it failed---to overhaul its institutions so that the state apparatus became the active agent in transforming society in the manner of the New Policies of ...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

《历史上的理学》是第一部在公元11世纪至17世纪的政治、经济、社会和文化变迁的大背景下，详细地阐释理学的萌发、兴盛和末落的著作。包弼德教授在进行这项研究方面具有得天独厚的优势。他对于中国政治史和社会经济史领域的前沿进展有深透的了解。他严谨地将理学界定为一种道德...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

很不错的一本书，对问题的分析还是切中肯綮的，至少没有其他某些老外的“隔离”。作者把理学至于广阔的背景下加以考察，清晰地勾勒出其发生发展的脉络。细节方面值得称道处亦不少：比如，作者认为，不应该把汉学和宋学的差异仅仅分析成重训诂和重义理的二元对立。又如，作者认...