包弼德(Peter K. Bol)是美國哈佛大學東亞語言與文明係的查理斯•卡威爾(Charles H. Carswell)講座教授,他同時也主持哈佛大學《中國曆史地理信息係統》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中國曆代人物傳記資料庫》(Chinese Biographical Database)等大型數據庫的建設工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992,中譯本《斯文:唐宋思想的轉型》),並閤編Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等書。包弼德最近十餘年的研究專注於討論理學的曆史角色,以及從地方史的視角齣發探討中國社會文化的變遷。
Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.
Taizong (r. 976-97), turned their attention to state building: defining the border, controlling independent military governors, recruiting civil administrators, regularizing tax collection and military provisioning, and re-establishing a national legal syst...
評分Taizong (r. 976-97), turned their attention to state building: defining the border, controlling independent military governors, recruiting civil administrators, regularizing tax collection and military provisioning, and re-establishing a national legal syst...
評分《历史上的理学》是第一部在公元11世纪至17世纪的政治、经济、社会和文化变迁的大背景下,详细地阐释理学的萌发、兴盛和末落的著作。 包弼德教授在进行这项研究方面具有得天独厚的优势。他对于中国政治史和社会经济史领域的前沿进展有深透的了解。他严谨地将理学界定为一种道德...
評分包弼德在此书中试图通过构筑塑造理学的社会历史背景来理解理学发生与发展的机理,并不拘泥于将理学视作一种对人生与秩序进行终极追问的哲学理路。本书从以下几方面展开论述。 理学产生的历史社会背景 与唐朝相比,中国政治社会在宋朝呈现了完全不一样的面目,有几...
評分Neo-Confucianism as social movement, and an alternative to the New Policies. 有時間重新過一下《中國轉嚮內在》,補筆記。往下可以無縫銜接王汎森。
评分有傳統地在最後說瞭些我愛聽的. 三天四夜讀完.
评分有傳統地在最後說瞭些我愛聽的. 三天四夜讀完.
评分有傳統地在最後說瞭些我愛聽的. 三天四夜讀完.
评分感覺是為普知大眾而寫。不過角度很新穎: neoconfunianism is not a philosophy , instead, it was more like a intellectual movement
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有