Before and Beyond Divergence pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Jean-Laurent Rosenthal is the Rea A. and Lela G. Axline Professor of Business Economics at the California Institute of Technology.
R. Bin Wong is Professor of History and Director of the Asia Institute at the University of California, Los Angeles.
- 经济史
- 海外中国研究
- 历史
- Bin.Wong
- Economics
- 欧洲
- 王国斌
- history
China has reemerged as a powerhouse in the global economy, reviving a classic question in economic history: why did sustained economic growth arise in Europe rather than in China?
Many favor cultural and environmental explanations of the nineteenth-century economic divergence between Europe and the rest of the world. This book, the product of over twenty years of research, takes a sharply different tack. It argues that political differences which crystallized well before 1800 were responsible both for China’s early and more recent prosperity and for Europe’s difficulties after the fall of the Roman Empire and during early industrialization.
Rosenthal and Wong show that relative prices matter to how economies evolve; institutions can have a large effect on relative prices; and the spatial scale of polities can affect the choices of institutions in the long run. Their historical perspective on institutional change has surprising implications for understanding modern transformations in China and Europe and for future expectations. It also yields insights in comparative economic history, essential to any larger social science account of modern world history.
具体描述
读后感
had the honor of meeting with the two authors today, so it occurred to me that I should write a review for this book. if you look at the literature, the cooperation between economics and history is way less successful than I once thought.To quote this book...
评分加州学派与“大分流” 对中西方生产方式和经济发展的差异性研究长期充斥着“宿命论”的观点——无论是文化上，还是制度上。似乎中国有着先天性的不足：中国文化先天上不热爱私有，中国社会先天上抵制契约精神。当然这种基于“西方中心论”的解释在上个世纪就受到了普遍的质疑与...
评分作者简介：周琳，清华大学院历史系。 文章来源：《清华大学学报：哲社版》，2009年第1期，第50-58页。 摘要：在中国社会经济史学界，“加州学派”近年来影响日益扩大，其观点正变得日益清晰和引人瞩目。“加州学派”并不是一个无差别的整体，而是不同国别、不同研究领域、不同...
评分美国“加州学派”历史学者彭慕兰（Kenneth Pomeranz）的《大分流》曾高调进入中国。2004年，大陆和台湾同时出版了中译本（两岸译者都以经济史为其主要研究领域，简体版是史建云，繁体版是邱澎生）。《大分流》使“大分流”成为学术界和读书圈的流行词，也再度引起对“中国何以...
评分美国“加州学派”历史学者彭慕兰（Kenneth Pomeranz）的《大分流》曾高调进入中国。2004年，大陆和台湾同时出版了中译本（两岸译者都以经济史为其主要研究领域，简体版是史建云，繁体版是邱澎生）。《大分流》使“大分流”成为学术界和读书圈的流行词，也再度引起对“中国何以...
用户评价
去年五月在皮凯蒂的主页找到的英文版，很有趣的交集。和《通往工业革命的漫长道路》一起读的，有点相互补充的感觉。观点不新，部分地方缺乏材料支撑，但论证逻辑的推演很仔细。这本书一度成了我的文献索引，按照每章的参考文献找文章读。
评分模型混乱。
评分Again the fit theory, also the target of Vries' 2015 book.
评分可读性还挺强的，不过大概也可以归纳到“中西对比”一类的套路里？结论就是要“放宽历史的视野”：大分流始于更早的历史时期的设定（尤其是政治层面的差异），而不是显见的19世纪。
评分日益无感于此类不可证不可知的问题。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有