在线阅读本书
First published in 1946, History of Western Philosophy went on to become the best-selling philosophy book of the twentieth century. A dazzlingly ambitious project, it remains unchallenged to this day as the ultimate introduction to Western philosophy. Providing a sophisticated overview of the ideas that have perplexed people from time immemorial, Russell's History of Western Philosophy offered a cogent précis of its subject. Of course this cannot be the only reason it ended up the best selling philosophy book of the twentieth century. Russell's book was 'long on wit, intelligence and curmudgeonly scepticism', as the New York Times noted, and it is this, coupled with the sheer brilliance of its scholarship, that has made Russell's History of Western Philosophy one of the most important philosophical works of all time.
算是我西哲的入门书籍,梳理性比较强,但是其中夹杂了一些八卦故事确实比较...英伦(以前看英国史纪录片就诧异:怎么是由诸多八卦构成的)本来分可以再打高一点的,但是曾读到冯友兰自述Russell以冯友兰英文不过关为由拒绝给他写序,就觉得Russell自我中心了,哲学不是语言学(...
评分Russell’s A History of Western Philosophy: A Revisit I completely agree with Russell when he said the scope of philosophy is everything between what can be ascertained by exact science and what can only be answered by religion. Every introductory book on...
评分如果要选出一本在学院派和大众读者之间评价最为迥异的学术著作,罗素的《西方哲学史》一定是最具竞争力的候选之一。尤其是考虑到这本书在中国所受到的待遇,情况就更是如此。作为最早一批被译成中文的哲学史著作,头顶着诺贝尔文学奖的光环,译者亦是大家,单是这些名头...
评分No word could be adequate to express the enormous joy and excitedment I felt when I found an according argument in Bertrand Russell's "A History of Western Philosophy" agreeing a rough idea of mine which, quite intuitionally, occured to me in a conversation...
评分如果要选出一本在学院派和大众读者之间评价最为迥异的学术著作,罗素的《西方哲学史》一定是最具竞争力的候选之一。尤其是考虑到这本书在中国所受到的待遇,情况就更是如此。作为最早一批被译成中文的哲学史著作,头顶着诺贝尔文学奖的光环,译者亦是大家,单是这些名头...
听了十几章才开始看书。听的时候各种跪(蜀黍声音超好听!),读的时候因为可以停下来欣赏&学习语言了(而不像听是单纯汲取信息)所以直接长跪不想起…… 男神怎么能这么神…
评分读了几个星期,序章也没有突破,果断放弃了。等十年后再入门吧。
评分Good and lucid introduction of the ideas of western philosophy. The use of the world "western" here in the title shows the modesty of Russel
评分读之前以为这书是大学哲学导论必读书目那样的西方哲学史,结果它是袁腾飞说历史那样的西方哲学史。pre-Socratics部分真的不错,文笔优美,逻辑性强。但从柏拉图开始,罗素放飞自我,想哪儿写哪儿,还总是乱入自己的观点。行文像是急着给编辑交稿那样,结构混乱没逻辑。失望。深深地失望。感觉还是《苏菲的世界》写的更好。
评分1946; 1961.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有