Robert Gibbons
Sloan Distinguished Professor of Organizational Economics and Strategy
Sloan School and Department of Economics
This book introduces one of the most powerful tools of modern economics to a wide audience: those who will later construct or consume game-theoretic models. Robert Gibbons addresses scholars in applied fields within economics who want a serious and thorough discussion of game theory but who may have found other works overly abstract. Gibbons emphasizes the economic applications of the theory at least as much as the pure theory itself; formal arguments about abstract games play a minor role. The applications illustrate the process of model building--of translating an informal description of a multi-person decision situation into a formal game-theoretic problem to be analyzed. Also, the variety of applications shows that similar issues arise in different areas of economics, and that the same game-theoretic tools can be applied in each setting. In order to emphasize the broad potential scope of the theory, conventional applications from industrial organization have been largely replaced by applications from labor, macro, and other applied fields in economics. The book covers four classes of games, and four corresponding notions of equilibrium: static games of complete information and Nash equilibrium, dynamic games of complete information and subgame-perfect Nash equilibrium, static games of incomplete information and Bayesian Nash equilibrium, and dynamic games of incomplete information and perfect Bayesian equilibrium.
我觉得接受正统经济学研究训练就是学习经济理论和掌握分析工具【当然真正要做好研究还必须能将二者熟练结合,然而这是以后的事了,在学生阶段尚不需要过多接触,该方面类似的书有埃斯里奇的《应用经济学研究方法》经科版】而博弈论就是一种重要的分析方法。 基础...
评分关于博弈论教材的总论请参考 http://www.douban.com/note/62777167/。 下面是对这本书单独的一点评论。 看还没人写书评,现在闲就随便写一点。我学博弈论是从这本书入的门,虽然后来也读到过其他好教材,但还是认为这是最好的入门书。 这本书有另外一个英文名,叫做 "Game th...
评分很多评论说通俗易懂。 这本其实不好读,翻阅一下,没有非常复杂的公式。 但是博弈论就是这样,语言逻辑非常密集,读过程中,哪一个稍微疏忽,下面就不明白。 精神高度集中就很累,博弈论更像是逻辑学而不太有数学感。 建模过程的高度抽象也是很训练,因为同样事物,你建立的就...
评分很多评论说通俗易懂。 这本其实不好读,翻阅一下,没有非常复杂的公式。 但是博弈论就是这样,语言逻辑非常密集,读过程中,哪一个稍微疏忽,下面就不明白。 精神高度集中就很累,博弈论更像是逻辑学而不太有数学感。 建模过程的高度抽象也是很训练,因为同样事物,你建立的就...
评分习题啊...想要答案555
评分习题啊...想要答案555
评分2008年第一次接触Game Theory看了点张维迎大抄家 - 2011年开始了看这本书第一章。2014年还在看第四章(还觉得好难。。。) ...论虚岁都长到什么地方去了。
评分我教授说tedious and unnecessary,但是这正是我需要的。
评分Well-written, comprehensive and intuitive. I totally agree this is one of the best (if not the best) introductory textbooks to non-cooperative game theory!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有