In this landmark exploration of the origins of nationalism and cultural identity in China, Pamela Kyle Crossley traces the ways in which a large, early modern empire of Eurasia, the Qing (1636-1912), incorporated neighboring, but disparate, political traditions into a new style of emperorship. Drawing on a wide variety of primary sources, including Manchu, Korean, and Chinese archival materials, Crossley argues that distortions introduced in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century historical records have blinded scholars to the actual course of events in the early years of the dynasty. This groundbreaking study examines the relationship between the increasingly abstract ideology of the centralizing emperorship of the Qing and the establishment of concepts of identity in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, before the advent of nationalism in China. Concluding with a broad-ranging postscript on the implications of her research for studies of nationalism and nation-building throughout modern Chinese history, A Translucent Mirror combines a readable narrative with a sophisticated, revisionary look at China's history. Crossley's book will alter current understandings of the Qing emperorship, the evolution of concepts of ethnicity, and the legacy of Qing rule for modern Chinese nationalism.
Pamela Kyle Crossley is Rosenwald Research Professor of History, Dartmouth College; author of Orphan Warriors: Three Manchu Generations and the End of the Qing World (1990) and The Manchus (1997); and coauthor (with Richard Bulliet and Dan Headrick) of The Earth and Its Peoples (1997).
按:这不是我翻译的,我从国学数典上搬运过来的。 本书前言: 曾有一度,现代“民族”、“族群”身份的源头,看似存在于许多世纪以来以各种形式表现出来、并在过去百余年间由于帝国主义式微、乃至印刷与数字传媒出现而得以重新提炼的共同体、团结和公益等观念中。尤其当我们...
评分按:这不是我翻译的,我从国学数典上搬运过来的。 本书前言: 曾有一度,现代“民族”、“族群”身份的源头,看似存在于许多世纪以来以各种形式表现出来、并在过去百余年间由于帝国主义式微、乃至印刷与数字传媒出现而得以重新提炼的共同体、团结和公益等观念中。尤其当我们...
评分2001年第4期 University of California Press, 1999 张慧文 译 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 柯娇燕的《半透明之镜:清帝国意识形态中的“历史”与“身份”》洞见深刻,标志着十年来清史研究的巅峰。与美国历史学家Mark...
评分按:这不是我翻译的,我从国学数典上搬运过来的。 本书前言: 曾有一度,现代“民族”、“族群”身份的源头,看似存在于许多世纪以来以各种形式表现出来、并在过去百余年间由于帝国主义式微、乃至印刷与数字传媒出现而得以重新提炼的共同体、团结和公益等观念中。尤其当我们...
评分意识形态、统治权和历史 清皇权接收信息,予之联想形式(associative forms),再将其送返。没有代理机构从头开始表演这套艺术。理想情况下或许能把理念转换和散播的每个时刻孤立起来,但既然这不可能,读者必须记住,清统治的各个时期在这方面从来不是静止的,视作一个整体的...
New Ch'ing History.
评分主要说了两部分,一是从Nurgaci到Hung taiji到乾隆的rulership和统治范型适应征服和统治底种种需要而发生转变,(作者坚持帝国意识形态关系从emperorship之内的范畴得到理解)。二是几种典型的民族身份正是18世纪底意识形态产物,产生于皇权建构及与之对应的行政管理对族群身份的塑造和操纵。这也成了19世纪末民族主义活动家底思想源头以及对他们行动的限定。 有洞见,但论述失之薄弱,浅尝辄止。
评分O, poststructuralism! Identity is forever changing.
评分"sinicization" remains interesting and important; asa theorem in contemporary discourse, it represents only a tangle of undemonstrable but sentimentally charged explanations for cultural change in East Asia. 哈哈
评分新清史四书最理论的一本,其实就是套理论套的最多的(尽管柯娇燕不肯坦承自己和安德森的关系),也难怪被钟喷的那么起劲……
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有