Edward J. M. Rhoads is professor of history at the University of Texas at Austin. He is the author of China's Republican Revolution: The Case of Kwangtung, 1895-1913.Winner of the Joseph Levenson Book Prize for Modern China, sponsored by The China and Inner Asia Council of the Association for Asian Studies
China's 1911-12 Revolution, which overthrew a 2000-year succession of dynasties, is thought of primarily as a change in governmental style, from imperial to republican, traditional to modern. But given that the dynasty that was overthrown—the Qing—was that of a minority ethnic group that had ruled China's Han majority for nearly three centuries, and that the revolutionaries were overwhelmingly Han, to what extent was the revolution not only anti-monarchical, but also anti-Manchu?
Edward Rhoads explores this provocative and complicated question in Manchus and Han, analyzing the evolution of the Manchus from a hereditary military caste (the "banner people") to a distinct ethnic group and then detailing the interplay and dialogue between the Manchu court and Han reformers that culminated in the dramatic changes of the early 20th century.
Until now, many scholars have assumed that the Manchus had been assimilated into Han culture long before the 1911 Revolution and were no longer separate and distinguishable. But Rhoads demonstrates that in many ways Manchus remained an alien, privileged, and distinct group. Manchus and Han is a pathbreaking study that will forever change the way historians of China view the events leading to the fall of the Qing dynasty. Likewise, it will clarify for ethnologists the unique origin of the Manchus as an occupational caste and their shifting relationship with the Han, from border people to rulers to ruled.
——读(美)路康乐著《满与汉:晚清到民国初期的族群关系与政治权力,1861—1928》 中央民族大学管理学院 吴磊 徐永志 摘要:美国学者路康乐所著《满与汉:晚清到民国初期的族群关系与政治权力,1861—1928》一书,运用“民族—社会”的视角,着重分析了清末民初政治变革背景...
評分Edward J . M. Rhoads , Manchus and Han : Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China , 1861—1928 ,Seattle and London : University of Washington Press , 2000 ,394pp. 2002 年4 月初在华盛顿召开的亚洲学会第54 届年会上, 宣...
評分 評分——读(美)路康乐著《满与汉:晚清到民国初期的族群关系与政治权力,1861—1928》 中央民族大学管理学院 吴磊 徐永志 摘要:美国学者路康乐所著《满与汉:晚清到民国初期的族群关系与政治权力,1861—1928》一书,运用“民族—社会”的视角,着重分析了清末民初政治变革背景...
評分將滿族構建認同與滿漢關係問題延展到清朝最末期,與歐柯接續而又有分歧,強調滿族/滿人形成的政治性。最早確有皇太極溯源語言文化和神話,但盛清時更多錶現為八旗分區駐防、朝廷恩寵、社會隔離、文化差異(服裝、語言、不纏足)職業差異(世襲旗兵或不經科舉當官)而形成軍事職業共同體,基於政治權力與精英封閉循環,旗製亦逐漸和滿人概念交纏而旗滿一體,相應地非旗/滿的漢人精英亦逐步塑造雙方認同。晚清改革觸動旗人利益,漢族精英多次提齣旗人優待與宗親權力過大問題,但慈禧奕匡載灃均未全心意推動清理,最終授予激進革命黨口實,暴力革命中權力訴求亦夾雜排滿情緒,也是在革命中滿族/滿人概念確立於民族/族群歧異。民國後為接管清代疆域而優待清室、五族共和,亦進一步確立滿人為族之念,至PRC方以基於自我認同之劃分確立狹隘的滿族。
评分相當棒,特彆厲害,真的很喜歡
评分相當棒,特彆厲害,真的很喜歡
评分相當棒,特彆厲害,真的很喜歡
评分考試臨近,加上書過期瞭,隻好囫圇吞棗地速讀瞭前兩章,幸好買瞭中文版,等考完瞭再看。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有