Beatrice S. Bartlett is Professor of History at Yale University. She has lived and traveled widely in Taiwan and the People's Republic of China and has written extensively on Ch'ing communications systems and the Ch'ing archives.
This book describes the transformation of Ch'ing governance from monarchical rule to ministerial administration, presenting a wholly new account of the Grand Council's founding and rise to dominance. This period has been viewed as an era of intensified government centralization and increasing autocracy, but Bartlett persuasively demonstrates that this characterization must be modified in the light of her findings.
Bartlett identifies the inner-outer court dichotomy—often studied in earlier dynasties but never before in the Ch'ing—as the key framework for understanding Grand Council development. She conclusively shows how the council arose from the Yung-cheng Emperor's attempt to enhance his own power by establishing several small subordinate (and not at all grand) inner-court staffs to bypass the outer-court bureaucracy. A single centralizing and managing body worthy of the title "grand" came into being only after Yung-cheng's death. As a result of the council's first century of growth, imperial power was subtly undermined even though it continued in force. Bartlett argues that it was the council's consolidated power as much as the strength of the monarchy that enabled the Ch'ing dynasty to achieve greatness in its middle years—defeating the Mongols and enlarging its territories—and at the end prolonged its life in spite of foreign incursions, internal rebellions, and infant emperors.
The Grand Council is the only high privy council of inperial China for which substantial documentation survives. For this book Bartlett traveled to both Taipei and Beijing to consult the newly available archival sources in both Chinese and Manchu necessary for her research. Her feat of archival reconstruction is a tremendous service to the entire field. Her findings on the Grand Council's patterns of growth, particularly such factors as inner-court informality and secrecy, the far-flung eighteenth-century military campaigns, the tripling of paperwork, and the manipulation of communications, will be useful to scholars studying similar phenomena in other periods and contexts, as Bartlett suggests in connection with the rise of the Ming grand secretaries.
Monarchs and Ministers offers a lively and fresh account of eighteenth-century Chinese political history that will engage the general reader as well as China specialists in many fields.
军机处之于清代中后期的政治生态,如同内阁之于明代中后期的政治生态一般,都具有非同寻常的重要意义。加上清代是距离当下最近的一个王朝,因此各种关于军机处和军机大臣故事的展现,在各类影视文学作品里屡见不鲜。然而遗憾的是,关于军机处的专著,却一直以来颇为鲜见。最近...
評分军机处之于清代中后期的政治生态,如同内阁之于明代中后期的政治生态一般,都具有非同寻常的重要意义。加上清代是距离当下最近的一个王朝,因此各种关于军机处和军机大臣故事的展现,在各类影视文学作品里屡见不鲜。然而遗憾的是,关于军机处的专著,却一直以来颇为鲜见。最近...
評分网络上曾流传过雍正和乾隆两位皇帝的“搞笑”批示。前者的批示感情色彩浓厚,夸人骂人都直抒胸臆,而后者的批示则套话连篇,各式各样的“知道了”被网友玩坏了。总之,两位清代皇帝的批示都与想象严重不符,甚至让人大跌眼镜。 经由美国学者白彬菊的这本讨论清中期军机处的书,...
評分网络上曾流传过雍正和乾隆两位皇帝的“搞笑”批示。前者的批示感情色彩浓厚,夸人骂人都直抒胸臆,而后者的批示则套话连篇,各式各样的“知道了”被网友玩坏了。总之,两位清代皇帝的批示都与想象严重不符,甚至让人大跌眼镜。 经由美国学者白彬菊的这本讨论清中期军机处的书,...
評分军机处之于清代中后期的政治生态,如同内阁之于明代中后期的政治生态一般,都具有非同寻常的重要意义。加上清代是距离当下最近的一个王朝,因此各种关于军机处和军机大臣故事的展现,在各类影视文学作品里屡见不鲜。然而遗憾的是,关于军机处的专著,却一直以来颇为鲜见。最近...
law and bureaucracy
评分very very hardcore institutional history, oh dear
评分law and bureaucracy
评分very very hardcore institutional history, oh dear
评分薑還是老的辣,歐立德本科老師。清代軍機處的源起與發展,“法外”的概念,內廷與外朝的分野,軍機處期初作為內廷一部分、逐漸成為連接內外橋梁的壯大過程,取代原有議政王大臣會議,並比原有會議更加確立滿漢雙支柱的大臣決策地位。注重特定官員個人在皇帝麵前利用軍機處角色與功能發揮的作用。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有