Culture, Power, and the State pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
Prasenjit Duara is Director of the Asia Research Institute at National University of Singapore.
- 海外中国研究
- 杜赞奇
- 历史
- 社会学
- 中国研究
- 文化
- PrasenjitDuara
- Duara
In the early twentieth century, the Chinese state made strenuous efforts to broaden and deepen its authority over rural society. This book is an ambitious attempt to offer both a method and a framework for analyzing Chinese social history in the state-making era.The author constructs a prismatic view of village-level society that shows how marketing, kinship, water control, temple patronage, and other structures of human interaction overlapped to form what he calls the cultural nexus of power in local society. The author's concept of the cultural nexus and his tracing of how it was altered enables us for the first time to grapple with change at the village level in all its complexity.The author asserts that the growth of the state transformed and delegitimized the traditional cultural nexus during the Republican era, particularly in the realm of village leadership and finances. Thus, the expansion of state power was ultimately and paradoxically responsible for the revolution in China as it eroded the foundations of village life, leaving nothing in its place.The problems of state-making in China were different from those of eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Europe; the Chinese experience heralds the process that would become increasingly common in the emergent states of the developing world under the very different circumstances of the twentieth century.
具体描述
读后感
权力的文化网络 《文化》相较现在流行的学术书籍而言，篇幅不多，8章，再加前言、结论以及作者对社会史研究方法的理解，由作者博士论文改编而来。8章中依次介绍了作者书中的主要概念——权力的文化网络，以及国家政权建设，作战论述权力的文化网络，国家政权建设的...
评分文化的权力网络 从研究方法上：首先说杜赞奇的研究方法及全书的研究思路：这本书中提出了两个中心概念，这两个中心概念因为我不了解当时或现在研究常用的研究术语和生态，因此，我感觉不到它的新意。但是，在书的序和后记部分，作者提到他用了两个概...
评分 评分 评分权力的文化网络 《文化》相较现在流行的学术书籍而言，篇幅不多，8章，再加前言、结论以及作者对社会史研究方法的理解，由作者博士论文改编而来。8章中依次介绍了作者书中的主要概念——权力的文化网络，以及国家政权建设，作战论述权力的文化网络，国家政权建设的...
用户评价
it seems very trendy to criticize a model/paradigm focusing too much on “consistency” and neglecting “culture”…It seems we can modify everything by pointing out there are contested/negotiated symbols…
评分need to re-read~
评分感觉杜赞奇很多的观点和Koselleck的观念史研究方法是有相似的。
评分史料详实机制细致。政治经济的清末、民初都好，但文化基本上只写到宗教了，现代化和意识形态的进入感觉写的不够味道。cultural nexus of power -- protective & entrepreneurial brokages -(modernization & fiscal pressure)- state involution
评分local society
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有