Sit back and enjoy a collection of verbatim exchanges from the halls of justice, where defendants and plaintiffs, lawyers and witnesses, juries and judges, collide to produce memorably insane comedy. The Court: "The charge here is theft of frozen chickens. Are you the defendant, sir?" Defendant: "No, sir, I'm the guy who stole the chickens."
具體描述
讀後感
Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
評分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
評分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
評分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
評分Attorney: Sir, all your answers must be oral. Witness: Yes, Sir. Attorney:Which school did you go to? Witness: Oral. Attorney: How many anatomises have you done on dead people, Doctor? Expert Witness: All of them.
用戶評價
神作！
评分文化差異蠻大的，然後森森的覺得翻譯君很偉大= =。。。雖然有些故事也覺得很有趣很好笑，但是大部分的段子沒掌握到笑點在哪裡。。。當然，也可能我的水平不夠= =
评分對這本並不是格外感興趣，特別閒的時候當作笑話書來讀的（其實也就類似笑話集嘛）；選修那幾門法律研究的時候看到裡麵的某些橋段的確會會心一笑～ 不過作者本身是本著收集法庭幽默事件為目的撰寫的專欄然後閤集齣的這本書，內容不算貧乏卻欠缺文采。
评分雖然老套，但真心蠻搞笑的。
评分Just for entertainment not informative...
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有