This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class consciousness, and the substantiation and consciousness of the Proletariat.Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukacs evaluated the influence of this book as follows:"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."George Lichtheim, also in 1968, writes that "...The originality of the early Lukacs lay in the assertion that the totality of history could be apprehended by adopting a particular 'class standpoint': that of the proletariat. Class consciousness;not indeed the empirical consciousness of the actual proletariat, which was hopelessly entangled with the surface aspects of objective reality, but an ideal-typical consciousness proper to a class which radically negates the existing order of reality: that was the formula which had made it possible for the Lukacs of 1923 to unify theory and practice."
什么是阶级,什么又是政治……其实,这一切都是历史或换言之,都是历史观念。远的从荷马、春秋说起,近的如过江之鲫。我国历史传统可谓源远而流长矣。但是,历史的可怕之处在于,它有时是一种文学叙事(海登·怀特语),即便是编年史派的统计和细化也不足也让其还原为主体的内...
評分“知识分子革命者”的困境——从卢卡奇晚年的自我批评说起 一、“这本书中那些我今天认为在理论上错误的部分往往影响最大” 卢卡奇一般被认为是“西方马克思主义”(与“经典马克思主义”相对而言)的创始人之一。他对于人的主观意识的重视、对于异化现象的开拓性论述...
評分卢卡奇《什么是正统马克思主义?》的逐段分析 卢卡奇在文章的引言中就大胆放言,“即使……放弃马克思的所有全部论点,而无需片刻放弃他的马克思主义立场。”这是因为,“马克思主义问题中的正统仅仅是指方法。它是这样一种科学的信念,即辩证的马克思主义是正确的研究方法,...
評分Georg Lukacs《历史与阶级意识》的思路 这是青年Lukacs在1919-1922年写的一些文章的结集,却是Lukacs最重要的作品,也是思想史上尤其是左派思想最重要的经典之一。剑桥20世纪政治思想史中说:“Lukacs是第一个严肃地评估黑格尔在马克思思想形成中的作用并重新把握到...
評分此书曾反复出现在我的论文中,但我其实还有个别篇章没有读完,准备写系列的读书笔记。以下是一小则: http://walterecho.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!C122B2B46F955957!322.entry
後麵整個西馬的意識形態策略,很大程度上就是來源於盧卡奇基於知識領域的“勞動分工”是一場騙局的判斷延展開的,盧卡奇主張重新恢復總體性以對抗資本主義無限分工帶來的人的懸置。核心幾篇論述比較囉嗦,但是觀點非常精彩。後麵西馬很多的概念都是來源於這本書,當然再往迴可以追溯到馬剋思和黑格爾。
评分心力交瘁。。
评分心力交瘁。。
评分心力交瘁。。
评分2012.3.26-2012.4.7 學瞭第一章,好喜歡的老師!
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有