From Philosophy to Philology 在线电子书 图书标签: 思想史 海外中国研究 Elman 历史 海外漢學 經學 社会史 清學
发表于2025-03-21
From Philosophy to Philology 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2025
清代尤其是18世紀學術轉變的內部動因及整個學術機制的變革。很必讀的作品,看完感覺很多繪畫史上的轉變都好理解多了。
评分知识社群学不止关注文本呈现范式方法转向和中西交互,更关注生产范式的知识社群形成(社会地位、经济背景)与联结形式(地方书院、图书出版、共同认定经典和当代著作等)。2001年新修版有个有趣角度:艾氏新修版序言谈到老版面临许多批评与误解,如理学朴学(或哲学与文字学)截然二分的不妥,英文词新儒学引发此词在17世纪(理学心学vs道学等)与20世纪(新亚书院的新儒学)意思的混淆并提出命名新方案(新儒学最好专指新亚一路),宗教vs教化对英语学者理解儒学与儒者群体的影响等,并大方承认当时英语圈儒学研究远逊日本,此似亦体现北美东亚研究作品潜藏前提:它们对话的知识社群首先是英语学者群,其次是当时被认为研究中国更透的学者群(如日本),最外反而是在地学者社群。艾氏自己对此认识清楚,也奇妙地与本书知识社群研究呼应。
评分专业英语什么的……
评分知识社群学不止关注文本呈现范式方法转向和中西交互,更关注生产范式的知识社群形成(社会地位、经济背景)与联结形式(地方书院、图书出版、共同认定经典和当代著作等)。2001年新修版有个有趣角度:艾氏新修版序言谈到老版面临许多批评与误解,如理学朴学(或哲学与文字学)截然二分的不妥,英文词新儒学引发此词在17世纪(理学心学vs道学等)与20世纪(新亚书院的新儒学)意思的混淆并提出命名新方案(新儒学最好专指新亚一路),宗教vs教化对英语学者理解儒学与儒者群体的影响等,并大方承认当时英语圈儒学研究远逊日本,此似亦体现北美东亚研究作品潜藏前提:它们对话的知识社群首先是英语学者群,其次是当时被认为研究中国更透的学者群(如日本),最外反而是在地学者社群。艾氏自己对此认识清楚,也奇妙地与本书知识社群研究呼应。
评分知识社群学不止关注文本呈现范式方法转向和中西交互,更关注生产范式的知识社群形成(社会地位、经济背景)与联结形式(地方书院、图书出版、共同认定经典和当代著作等)。2001年新修版有个有趣角度:艾氏新修版序言谈到老版面临许多批评与误解,如理学朴学(或哲学与文字学)截然二分的不妥,英文词新儒学引发此词在17世纪(理学心学vs道学等)与20世纪(新亚书院的新儒学)意思的混淆并提出命名新方案(新儒学最好专指新亚一路),宗教vs教化对英语学者理解儒学与儒者群体的影响等,并大方承认当时英语圈儒学研究远逊日本,此似亦体现北美东亚研究作品潜藏前提:它们对话的知识社群首先是英语学者群,其次是当时被认为研究中国更透的学者群(如日本),最外反而是在地学者社群。艾氏自己对此认识清楚,也奇妙地与本书知识社群研究呼应。
Benjamin Elman (Ph.D. University of Pennsylvania, 1980) is Professor of East Asian Studies and History with his primary department in East Asian Studies. His teaching and research fields include: 1) Chinese intellectual and cultural history, 1000-1900; 2) history of science in China, 1600-1930; 3) history of education in late imperial China; 4) Sino-Japanese cultural history, 1600-1850. His publications include: From Philosophy To Philology (1984, 1990, 2001); Classicism, Politics, and Kinship (1990); A Cultural History of Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (2000). He has recently completed two book projects: On Their Own Terms: Science in China, 1550-1900 (2005), and A Cultural History of Modern Science in Late Imperial China (2006). A new work entitled Meritocracy and Civil Examinations in Late Imperial China (HUP) is forthcoming in fall 2013. He is also currently editing several volumes from conferences held at Princeton under the auspices of PIIRS, EAP, and the Mellon Foundation on "Science in Republican China," "Languages, Literacies, and Vernaculars in Early Modern East Asia," and "Medical Classics and Medical Philology in East Asian, 1400-1900." During his leave in AY14, Elman will visit archives in China, Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea. His previous sabbatical leave in 2007-2008 was supported by a research fellowship from the American Council of Learned Societies.” Since then he has continued working on a new project entitled "The Intellectual Impact of Late Imperial Chinese Classicism, Medicine, and Science in Tokugawa Japan, 1700-1850," under the auspices of summer research grants from the Chiang Ching Kuo Foundation in Taiwan and the Mellon Foundation.
From Philosophy to Philology is an indispensable work on the intellectual life of China’s literati in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. While there was not a scientific revolution in China, there was an intellectual one. The shock of the Manchu conquest and the collapse of the Ming dynasty in 1644 led to a rejection of the moral self-cultivation that dominated intellectual life under the Ming. China’s scholars, particularly in the Yangzi River Basin, sought to restore China’s greatness by recapturing the wisdom of the ancients from the Warring States period (403–221 B.C.) and the Former Han dynasty (202 B.C.–9 A.D.), much as Renaissance Europe rediscovered the Greeks and Romans. But in China scholars faced the daunting task of determining which of many editions of the Classics were the true originals and which were forged additions of later centuries.
The ensuing search for authentic texts led to the founding of academies and libraries, the compiling of bibliographies, the rise of printing of editions of the Classics and Histories and commentaries on their components, the study of ancient inscriptions, and a two-hundred-year effort to discover and discard forged texts. In the process rigorous standards of scholarly training were adopted, and scholarship became a full-time profession distinct from gentry farmers or imperial officials.
从明到清,学术话语发生了一次巨大的转变,理学在被极大打击过后,异变成了以考据为核心的朴学,江南学术群体通过亲缘、地域等联系,形成了一群学术派系,他们在编修四库的时候就选择与自己学术观点相同的书籍,从而为之后学术研究发展的私家化做了铺垫。考据是义理的最终裁定...
评分 评分一直以来都对汉学家比较感兴趣,但是也限于自身读的他们的书比较少,所以一直未敢对之进行评析。这次借着读完从图书管里借来的艾尔曼的两本书(另一本是《经学、政治和宗族 : 中华帝国晚期常州今文学派研究》)的机会,也大体的说一下我对于汉学家的看法。 从他们研究...
评分六月第一周,读艾尔曼《从理学到朴学》与《经学、政治和宗族》二书,写得都非常好看。以知识社会学为方法来写的书,其实都很丰富有趣。由于两书名气甚大,都知道这是知识社会学治汉学的经典,所以我这里只谈一些细微的感受。 《从理学到朴学》,最精彩的是三四五章。研究了考...
评分六月第一周,读艾尔曼《从理学到朴学》与《经学、政治和宗族》二书,写得都非常好看。以知识社会学为方法来写的书,其实都很丰富有趣。由于两书名气甚大,都知道这是知识社会学治汉学的经典,所以我这里只谈一些细微的感受。 《从理学到朴学》,最精彩的是三四五章。研究了考...
From Philosophy to Philology 在线电子书 pdf 下载 txt下载 epub 下载 mobi 下载 2025