For a time it was almost a cliche to say that anthropology was a handmaiden of colonialism - by which was usually meant 'Western' colonialism. And this insinuation was assumed to somehow weaken the theoretical claims of anthropology and its fieldwork achievements. What this collection demonstrates is that colonialism was not only a Western phenomenon, but 'Eastern' as well. And that Japanese or Chinese anthropologists were also engaged in studying subject peoples. But wherever they were and whoever they were anthropologists always had a complex and problematic relationship with the colonial state. The latter saw some anthropologists' sympathy for 'the natives' as a threat, while on the other hand anthropological knowledge was used for the training of colonial officials. The impact of the colonial situation on the formation of anthropological theories is an important if not easily answered question, and the comparison of experiences in Asia offered in this book further helps to illuminate this complex relationship.
评分
评分
评分
评分
论文集。许多文章似乎仅出现在此书中。不少学者认为日本殖民时代的人类学是业余的人类学者所为,也并未直接影响殖民当局的政治策略。
评分论文集。许多文章似乎仅出现在此书中。不少学者认为日本殖民时代的人类学是业余的人类学者所为,也并未直接影响殖民当局的政治策略。
评分论文集。许多文章似乎仅出现在此书中。不少学者认为日本殖民时代的人类学是业余的人类学者所为,也并未直接影响殖民当局的政治策略。
评分论文集。许多文章似乎仅出现在此书中。不少学者认为日本殖民时代的人类学是业余的人类学者所为,也并未直接影响殖民当局的政治策略。
评分论文集。许多文章似乎仅出现在此书中。不少学者认为日本殖民时代的人类学是业余的人类学者所为,也并未直接影响殖民当局的政治策略。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有