Chaos of Disciplines pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Andrew Abbott is the Gustavus F. and Ann M. Swift Distinguished Service Professor in the Department of Sociology and the College at the University of Chicago. Abbott took his BA (in history and literature) at Harvard in 1970 and his PhD (in sociology) from the University of Chicago in 1982. Prior to his return to Chicago in 1991, he taught for thirteen years at Rutgers University.
Known for his ecological theories of occupations, Abbott has also pioneered algorithmic analysis of social sequence data. He has written on the foundations of social science methodology and on the evolution of the social sciences and the academic system. He is the author of five books and seventy articles and chapters.
His work includes The System of Professions (Chicago 1988), a theoretical analysis of the professions and their development that won the ASA's Sorokin Award in 1991. More recent books include a historical study of academic disciplines and publication (Department and Discipline [Chicago 1999]) and a theoretical analysis of fractal patterns in social and cultural structures Chaos of Disciplines [Chicago 2001]). Abbott has also published a collection of theoretical essays in the Chicago pragmatist and ecological tradition (Time Matters [Chicago 2001]) and a short introduction to heuristics in the social sciences (Methods of Discovery [Norton 2004]).
- 社會學
- 知識社會學
- sociology
- 英文原版
- 社會科學
- 科學社會學
- 社會學（英文）
- Knowledge
In this new study, Andrew Abbott presents a fresh and daring analysis of the evolution and development of the social sciences. "Chaos of Disciplines" reconsiders how knowledge actually changes and advances. Challenging the accepted belief that social sciences are in a perpetual state of progress, Abbott contends that disciplines instead cycle around an inevitable pattern of core principles. New schools of thought, then, are less a reaction to an established order than they are a reinvention of fundamental concepts. "Chaos of Disciplines" uses fractals to explain the patterns of disciplines, and then applies them to key debates that surround the social sciences. Abbott argues that knowledge in different disciplines is organized by common oppositions that function at any level of theoretical or methodological scale. Opposing perspectives of thought and method, then, in fields ranging from history, sociology and literature, become radically similar, much like fractals, they are each mutual reflections of their own distinctions.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
討論理論分形的方式，路數相當奇特，層次相當豐富。第一章正文勉強能理解，腳注就飄瞭。著重看瞭3&5.（04年MOD簡要覆蓋瞭這本些許內容；今年社會理論學報第一期是田老師訪談他，但一看社係官網居然停刊瞭...；這本居然一看看瞭半年...）
评分這本書跳開瞭時間理論，迴到一個結構問題：社會科學知識的結構（生成和發展），可以看作是相對獨立的作品。這個結構觀的實用版本在MoD；其衍生的部分是過剩理論（見「防禦性策略」，我很喜歡的部分）。另一個衍生問題就是規範性：如何思考規範性的法則（來馴服過剩？）。一個不那麼明顯的承續是知識空間的拓撲（結構的分形牽涉到指代性）。這個問題並沒有得到很好的解決：要在什麼樣的［幾何］意義下設想知識的多重性問題？
评分看完一臉問號。。
评分討論理論分形的方式，路數相當奇特，層次相當豐富。第一章正文勉強能理解，腳注就飄瞭。著重看瞭3&5.（04年MOD簡要覆蓋瞭這本些許內容；今年社會理論學報第一期是田老師訪談他，但一看社係官網居然停刊瞭...；這本居然一看看瞭半年...）
评分很奇妙，樂感很強的一本書。整本書所討論的核心現象(fractal distinction)與章節排布都像巴洛剋音樂一樣。前五章構成瞭一個相當緊湊精緻的主題(1.提齣社會科學領域中的fractal distinction現象；2-4.三個intellectual mechanism層麵的獨立個案; 5. social structure層麵的闡釋)，第六、七章則是野心更大的變奏。個人最喜歡第五章、第七章、尾聲。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有