Michael Pollan
Michael Pollan is the author of four five books: Second Nature, A Place of My Own, The Botany of Desire, which received the Borders Original Voices Award for the best nonfiction work of 2001 and was recognized as a best book of the year by the American Booksellers Association and Amazon, and the national bestellers, The Omnivore's Dilemma, and In Defense of Food.
A longtime contributing writer to The New York Times Magazine, Pollan is also the Knight Professor of Journalism at UC Berkeley. His writing on food and agriculture has won numerous awards, including the Reuters/World Conservation Union Global Award in Environmental Journalism, the James Beard Award, and the Genesis Award from the American Humane Association.
What to eat, what not to eat, and how to think about health: a manifesto for our times
"Eat food. Not too much. Mostly plants." These simple words go to the heart of Michael Pollan's In Defense of Food, the well-considered answers he provides to the questions posed in the bestselling The Omnivore's Dilemma.
Humans used to know how to eat well, Pollan argues. But the balanced dietary lessons that were once passed down through generations have been confused, complicated, and distorted by food industry marketers, nutritional scientists, and journalists-all of whom have much to gain from our dietary confusion. As a result, we face today a complex culinary landscape dense with bad advice and foods that are not "real." These "edible foodlike substances" are often packaged with labels bearing health claims that are typically false or misleading. Indeed, real food is fast disappearing from the marketplace, to be replaced by "nutrients," and plain old eating by an obsession with nutrition that is, paradoxically, ruining our health, not to mention our meals. Michael Pollan's sensible and decidedly counterintuitive advice is: "Don't eat anything that your great-great grandmother would not recognize as food."
Writing In Defense of Food, and affirming the joy of eating, Pollan suggests that if we would pay more for better, well-grown food, but buy less of it, we'll benefit ourselves, our communities, and the environment at large. Taking a clear-eyed look at what science does and does not know about the links between diet and health, he proposes a new way to think about the question of what to eat that is informed by ecology and tradition rather than by the prevailing nutrient-by-nutrient approach.
In Defense of Food reminds us that, despite the daunting dietary landscape Americans confront in the modern supermarket, the solutions to the current omnivore's dilemma can be found all around us.
In looking toward traditional diets the world over, as well as the foods our families-and regions-historically enjoyed, we can recover a more balanced, reasonable, and pleasurable approach to food. Michael Pollan's bracing and eloquent manifesto shows us how we might start making thoughtful food choices that will enrich our lives and enlarge our sense of what it means to be healthy.
本书的作者迈克尔•波伦,是美国饮食界的“文化担当”,被誉为“食物之神”。他的作品曾经多次获得詹姆斯·比尔德奖,这可是美食界的奥斯卡奖。他就像一位美食侦探,奔波在农场、超市和厨房之间,深入研究西方饮食对人类社会造成的影响。并为真实的食物发声,反抗食品工业和...
評分第一次读Pollan的书是因为机缘巧合,《植物的欲望》,一本很有启发的人与自然。后来就一直缱绻在这本 In Defense of Food 上,直到昨天才了结。 很经典的际遇是,并没有先锋的科学和超前的理论企图要挟我们。因为回归自然的呼声确实屡次在内心此起彼伏,往往只是苦于、或困于眼...
評分 評分 評分本周读物:《为食物辩护》,讲营养学的神话以及应该如何“健康地吃”。其实全本书有点拖沓,想说的内容、大原则可以压缩到1/3容量。另外就是感觉该书是写给吃得过多过快过精细的美国胖子看的,某些内容还没到需要国人担忧的程度。个人评分3.5/5 作者主要建议撷选: 1. 要吃食物...
術語太多 一句話說完不就得瞭
评分科學,邏輯。。。都很匱乏。名詞和"seem", "might", "maybe"很多。可以參照Lies, damned lies and science 這本來讀。
评分可以說是Whole30的古早廣告。 Quick takeaway:如果食物包裝上有五個以上你不認識不會念的成分就彆買瞭
评分可以說是Whole30的古早廣告。 Quick takeaway:如果食物包裝上有五個以上你不認識不會念的成分就彆買瞭
评分感覺作者過於執著於迴歸自然,而現狀是迴歸自然的成本是大多數人無法承擔的
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有