Mistakes Were Made pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2025
"卡罗尔•塔夫里斯（Carol Tavris），社会心理学家、演说家和作家。她还为《洛杉矶时报》、《纽约时报》、《科学美国人》和其他一些出版物撰写心理学专栏文章。
艾略特•阿伦森（Elliot Aronson），当今世界上最杰出的社会心理学家之一，全球销量突破千万册的《社会性动物》作者。他被同时代的人推选为“20世纪最有影响力的100位心理学家之一”，也是唯一一位获得过由美国心理学会颁发的写作、教学和研究3个最高奖项的心理学家。
- 心理学
- 思维
- 判断与决策
- 英文原版
- psychology
- 心理
- 刘未鹏
- 决策
Why do people dodge responsibility when things fall apart? Why the parade of public figures unable to own up when they make mistakes? Why the endless marital quarrels over who is right? Why can we see hypocrisy in others but not in ourselves? Are we all liars? Or do we really believe the stories we tell? Renowned social psychologists Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson take a compelling look into how the brain is wired for self-justification. When we make mistakes, we must calm the cognitive dissonance that jars our feelings of self-worth. And so we create fictions that absolve us of responsibility, restoring our belief that we are smart, moral, and right - a belief that often keeps us on a course that is dumb, immoral, and wrong. Backed by years of research and delivered in lively, energetic prose, "Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)" offers a fascinating explanation of self-deception - how it works, the harm it can cause, and how we can overcome it.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Sharp point of view criticizing the fact that 'everyone is for himself' and 'everyone is protecting himself'.Life is composed by pride and prejudice..for conserving pride, people lie to themselves to make them feeling better,and no one is devoid of prejudice of the world which helps them justifying their action.
评分First five chapters are amazing explanations of cognitive dissonance, which leads to confirmation biases and aggravating self-justifications. The last three chapters contains nothing new and feel dull and boring. Worst part: like many other books, the list of references/footnotes takes up 40% of the book - what the heck?
评分Cognitive Dissident，最近几次遇到这个词，需要尽快读一下这本。这本书证实一直以来对心理学偏见的起源，心理治疗师多数是神棍一样的人物，心理学必须经历科学实证的检验。另外，解释了刑事司法系统的冤案错案的心理学原因。真正的理中客其实非常难，承认自己不客观，才有可能客观。关于问题的分析解释很中肯，不过，作者提出的解决方法恰恰反映同样的问题，让瘾君子主动戒毒，靠人们自我批评的看法太幼稚，社会心理学解决政治问题完全是一厢情愿。
评分感觉上对于cognitive dissonance理论的应用有些引申过度，不过作者Carol Tavris是American Psychological Association的fellow，还是很靠谱的。她老公第二作者Elliot Aronson就名气更大了。
评分都是social psy的东西，也因此常常会不信任人类，尤其是自己。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有