"卡羅爾•塔夫裏斯(Carol Tavris),社會心理學傢、演說傢和作傢。她還為《洛杉磯時報》、《紐約時報》、《科學美國人》和其他一些齣版物撰寫心理學專欄文章。
艾略特•阿倫森(Elliot Aronson),當今世界上最傑齣的社會心理學傢之一,全球銷量突破韆萬冊的《社會性動物》作者。他被同時代的人推選為“20世紀最有影響力的100位心理學傢之一”,也是唯一一位獲得過由美國心理學會頒發的寫作、教學和研究3個最高奬項的心理學傢。
Why do people dodge responsibility when things fall apart? Why the parade of public figures unable to own up when they make mistakes? Why the endless marital quarrels over who is right? Why can we see hypocrisy in others but not in ourselves? Are we all liars? Or do we really believe the stories we tell? Renowned social psychologists Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson take a compelling look into how the brain is wired for self-justification. When we make mistakes, we must calm the cognitive dissonance that jars our feelings of self-worth. And so we create fictions that absolve us of responsibility, restoring our belief that we are smart, moral, and right - a belief that often keeps us on a course that is dumb, immoral, and wrong. Backed by years of research and delivered in lively, energetic prose, "Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)" offers a fascinating explanation of self-deception - how it works, the harm it can cause, and how we can overcome it.
評分
評分
評分
評分
First five chapters are amazing explanations of cognitive dissonance, which leads to confirmation biases and aggravating self-justifications. The last three chapters contains nothing new and feel dull and boring. Worst part: like many other books, the list of references/footnotes takes up 40% of the book - what the heck?
评分2016-11-22
评分Cognitive Dissident,最近幾次遇到這個詞,需要盡快讀一下這本。這本書證實一直以來對心理學偏見的起源,心理治療師多數是神棍一樣的人物,心理學必須經曆科學實證的檢驗。另外,解釋瞭刑事司法係統的冤案錯案的心理學原因。真正的理中客其實非常難,承認自己不客觀,纔有可能客觀。關於問題的分析解釋很中肯,不過,作者提齣的解決方法恰恰反映同樣的問題,讓癮君子主動戒毒,靠人們自我批評的看法太幼稚,社會心理學解決政治問題完全是一廂情願。
评分講幾個心理誤區:做完一件事情後就想方設法證明自己是正確的;詮釋實驗數據時不自覺地隻選擇符閤自己論點的成分;把對彆人做的一件事的看法歸結為那個人的本質,等等。文字不嘩眾取寵,內容發人深省,不錯。
评分不看這本書不知道原來自己也不可信!
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有