"卡羅爾•塔夫裏斯(Carol Tavris),社會心理學傢、演說傢和作傢。她還為《洛杉磯時報》、《紐約時報》、《科學美國人》和其他一些齣版物撰寫心理學專欄文章。
艾略特•阿倫森(Elliot Aronson),當今世界上最傑齣的社會心理學傢之一,全球銷量突破韆萬冊的《社會性動物》作者。他被同時代的人推選為“20世紀最有影響力的100位心理學傢之一”,也是唯一一位獲得過由美國心理學會頒發的寫作、教學和研究3個最高奬項的心理學傢。
Why do people dodge responsibility when things fall apart? Why the parade of public figures unable to own up when they make mistakes? Why the endless marital quarrels over who is right? Why can we see hypocrisy in others but not in ourselves? Are we all liars? Or do we really believe the stories we tell? Renowned social psychologists Carol Tavris and Elliot Aronson take a compelling look into how the brain is wired for self-justification. When we make mistakes, we must calm the cognitive dissonance that jars our feelings of self-worth. And so we create fictions that absolve us of responsibility, restoring our belief that we are smart, moral, and right - a belief that often keeps us on a course that is dumb, immoral, and wrong. Backed by years of research and delivered in lively, energetic prose, "Mistakes Were Made (But Not by Me)" offers a fascinating explanation of self-deception - how it works, the harm it can cause, and how we can overcome it.
評分
評分
評分
評分
內容值得一看,但是故事敘述和觀點聯係太繁冗瞭。另外我覺得它的理論雖然有足夠的支撐,可是態度有點消極,基本上在說我們的大腦在盡其所能讓我們做個混蛋,但是justifying dissonance還是有很重要的生理意義的。
评分摘錄:All of us have hard decisions to make at times in our lives; not all of them will be right ... and wise. Some are complicated, with consequences we could never have foreseen. If we can resist the temptation to justify our actions in a rigid, overconfident way, we can leave the door open to empathy and an appreciation of life's complexity...
评分2016-11-22
评分誰會認錯
评分內容值得一看,但是故事敘述和觀點聯係太繁冗瞭。另外我覺得它的理論雖然有足夠的支撐,可是態度有點消極,基本上在說我們的大腦在盡其所能讓我們做個混蛋,但是justifying dissonance還是有很重要的生理意義的。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 qciss.net All Rights Reserved. 小哈圖書下載中心 版权所有