Yunxiang Yan is Professor of Anthropology at the University of California, Los Angeles, and Adjunct Professor in the School of Public Policy and Social Development, Fudan University, China. He is the author of Te Flow of Gifts: Reciprocity and Social Networks in a Chinese Village (Stanford University Press, 1996), Private Life under Socialism: Love, Intimacy, and Family Change in a Chinese Village, 1949–1999 (Stanford University Press, 2003) and The Individualization of Chinese Society (Berg, 2009). His research interests include family and kinship, social change, the individual and individualization, and moral changes in post-Mao China.
For seven years in the 1970s, the author lived in a village in northeast China as an ordinary farmer. In 1989, he returned to the village as an anthropologist to begin the unparalleled span of eleven years’ fieldwork that has resulted in this book―a comprehensive, vivid, and nuanced account of family change and the transformation of private life in rural China from 1949 to 1999. The author’s focus on the personal and the emotional sets this book apart from most studies of the Chinese family. Yan explores private lives to examine areas of family life that have been largely overlooked, such as emotion, desire, intimacy, privacy, conjugality, and individuality. He concludes that the past five decades have witnessed a dual transformation of private life: the rise of the private family, within which the private lives of individual women and men are thriving.
得到听书: 首先是择偶方式的变化,年轻一代取代了父母在自己择偶过程中的主导地位。第二,家庭关系的结构发生改变。夫妻关系的重要性显著上升,并且逐步取代过去的父权制度。第三,居住空间的私密化带来了隐私观念的普及。第四,传统大家庭的分家时间不断提前,彩礼金额逐步上...
评分一、全书综述 《私人生活的变革:一个中国村庄里的爱情、家庭与亲密关系》这本书中,作者的观点简单鲜明:一是农民的私人生活经历了私人家庭崛起和家庭内部个人私生活普遍出现的双重转型。二是国家在农民私人生活的转型及个人主体性形成过程中所起的重要作用,包括集体化时期对...
评分十分失望,仅仅是一个标准化的中国研究,拿到列文森奖也就不奇怪也不值得吹嘘了。虽然是一个严肃的研究,但是套路是西方理论加中国经验,先不论有没有中国主体性的问题意识,本身对于西方理论自身反思性不足,而经验田野也不进行深描。导致研究在理论还是在经验上都显得...
评分闫云翔的田野调查扎实、案头工作详实,例子生动鲜活、很有人情味,第一手数据资料可靠可信,写作风格沉稳朴实、层层推进。溢美之词不再赘述。总之,作为列文森图书奖获奖作品,《私人生活的变革》不仅承载了作者作为一位杰出的人类学家的勤恳、才华和人文关怀,也将启...
评分果然研究intimacy虾米的有意思多了。。。难怪现在女性学者都喜欢做这方面。想起当年本科一个师姐去普度读社会学PHD,就选了家庭社会学的方向,提醒偶们广大女生,做这方面相对容易和能保持活力。。。现在想来也不无道理啊。研究森怕入错方向,喵呜=。=
评分arguments are not complicated, but still interesting to read
评分挺有趣的书,易读易懂,完了能让人注意到身边一些被忽视的变化。但是缺点也很明显,缺乏对既有概念的反思(love, privete life, privacy, romantic), 完全不分析这些概念在不同时空中的不同意义,假定它们有恒定的本质。同样被本质化的还有Tradition, traditional family之类的东西。这些东西在历史书写里都应该是可以多加考虑的。
评分其实呢,这个应该算是本土人类学的中国个案吧。
评分特别车轱辘话!个体化、原子化、个人主义、个体主义全晕了ORZ
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有