埃里克·亚伯拉罕森
哥伦比亚大学商学院管理学教授,著有《没有任何副作用的改变》。他的独特且具有争议的研究被认为是挑战传统的管理智慧。他已在包括《哈佛商业评论》在内的众多顶级管理期刊上发表文章,并经常为全世界的管理层听众演讲。
Like Freakonomics, here is a book that combines counterintuitive thinking with stories from everyday life to provide a striking new view of how our world works. Ever since Einstein's study of Brownian Motion, scientists have understood that a little disorder actually makes systems more effective. But most people still shun disorder--or suffer guilt over the mess they can't avoid. No longer! With a spectacular array of anecdotes and case studies of the useful role mess can play, here is an antidote to the accepted wisdom that tight schedules, neatness, and consistency are the keys to success. Drawing on examples from business, parenting, cooking, the war on terrorism, retail, and even the meteoric career of Arnold Schwarzenegger, coauthors Abrahamson and Freedman demonstrate that moderately messy systems use resources more efficiently, yield better solutions, and are harder to break than neat ones. A Perfect Mess will help readers assess what the right amount of disorder is for a given system, and how to apply these ideas onto a large scale--government, society-- and on a small scale--in your attic, kitchen, or office. A Perfect Mess will forever change the way we think about those unruly heaps of paper on our desks.
最近翻了2本这种理念类的图书。总体感觉是没什么必要买,特别是你对这个标题的概念与自己的想法类似的时候就更不需要买了,大部分的时候是一种说教,举出无数个实例来说服你。看了半天没什么意思,都是空对空,不过对混乱感到彻底反感的人也许还是有些价值的。 我觉得以后这类...
评分这是一部为有着邋遢习惯、生活不够整洁秩序的人的一本正名作。我要说我打开这本书看到前面几章时,我的感觉是相当开心啊。原来书桌混乱、不爱整洁的科学家除了爱因斯坦还有那么多啊,而且好多都取得了很大的成就有木有?弗莱彻乱放在窗口的培养皿里钻进了青霉素,他看到了就...
评分看到书名的时候,我很期待。 因为我的生活就是混乱不堪的,为此骄傲的小心脏一直备受折磨,为什么隔壁老王可以把时间安排得井然有序,把房间收拾得干干净净,十条粉红色三角内裤总是叠得整整齐齐,而我房间里臭袜子遍地都是? 我幻想着,这本书应该以严密周全不容辩驳的论证告...
评分1.老妈的十(万)个为什么 Not surprisingly, my mother, who is incredibly organized and neat , always feels comfused as soon as geting into my department. In the following sentences, for example ,there are something she may never understand so she has to quset ...
评分前半段有点强词夺理的感觉,后半段的案例还可以。也不知道是不是那两个合作作者的前后分工。 作者2006年不看涨苹果,认为苹果恐怕在iPod之后,后继乏力。5年之后评判,苹果显然并非如此。
Interesting...
评分Interesting...
评分feel-good book
评分feel-good book
评分feel-good book
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.wenda123.org All Rights Reserved. 图书目录大全 版权所有